Government of Gujarat vs AJITBHAI SATYVEER CHAUDHARI Advocate - V R SHUKLA — 6/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 363,366,376(2)N,114,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 20th March 2026.
PCSO - SPECIAL CASE - PCSO
CNR: GJSR190001972023
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
6/2023
Filing Date
08-02-2023
Registration No
6/2023
Registration Date
08-02-2023
Court
ADDL.DISTRICT COURT, BARDOLI
Judge
1-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
20th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11214046220799
Police Station
PALSANA POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
AJITBHAI SATYVEER CHAUDHARI Advocate - V R SHUKLA
SURAJSING JAYSING THAKOR(Absconding)
Adv. V R SHUKLA
SANIR ALIAS MOTIYA SATYVAN JAT(In Jail for another offence)
Adv. K U MISTRY
Hearing History
Judge: 1-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FURTHER STATEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 20-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 12-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 09-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 02-03-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 21-02-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Special POCSO Court in Bardoli acquitted both accused (Ajitbhai Satyaveersingh Gauri and Seer alias Mortiya Satyavan Jaat) of charges under IPC sections 363, 366, 376(2)(a), 114 and POCSO Act sections 4, 6, 8. While the court established that the victim was a minor (15 years, 3 months old) at the time of the alleged incident on 23 September 2022, the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused kidnapped her or committed sexual offenses against her consent, as her own testimony and evidence did not sufficiently corroborate these elements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Court Decision Summary The Special POCSO Court in Bardoli acquitted both accused (Ajitbhai Satyaveersingh Gauri and Seer alias Mortiya Satyavan Jaat) of charges under IPC sections 363, 366, 376(2)(a), 114 and POCSO Act sections 4, 6, 8. While the court established that the victim was a minor (15 years, 3 months old) at the time of the alleged incident on 23 September 2022, the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused kidnapped her or committed sexual offenses against her consent, as her own testimony and evidence did not sufficiently corroborate these elements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts