MEHULSING DILIPSING GODADARIYA vs SUVIDHA CO. OP. CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED — 13/2026

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL

CNR: GJSR190001542026

Filing Number

13/2026

Filing Date

07-Feb-2026

Registration No

13/2026

Registration Date

07-Feb-2026

Court

ADDL.DISTRICT COURT, BARDOLI

Judge

2-5th Addl District Judge

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 22-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138
Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MEHULSING DILIPSING GODADARIYA

    Adv. K R PATEL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SUVIDHA CO. OP. CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    The court allowed the criminal appeal and set aside the conviction, sentence, and compensation order against the appellant for cheque dishonor under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act. The decision was based on a compromise between the parties where the complainant received the cheque amount and agreed to withdraw the case, with 20% of the amount to be deposited and returned per mutual consent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    5th Addl District Judge

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    5th Addl District Judge

  5. 07-Feb-2026

    Order

  6. 07-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 07-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 13/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed the criminal appeal and set aside the conviction, sentence, and compensation order against the appellant for cheque dishonor under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act. The decision was based on a compromise between the parties where the complainant received the cheque amount and agreed to withdraw the case, with 20% of the amount to be deposited and returned per mutual consent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case