RAMSAGAR MAHTO/SAKSHI PRINTS LTD vs SHAILESHBHAI DHIRUBHAI NAKRANI/SHIVANI PROSESAR LTD Advocate - R V SANEPARA — 8/2025

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415(3)K. Status: FOR R&P. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.

CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL

CNR: GJSR190001022025

FOR R&P

Next Hearing

27th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

8/2025

Filing Date

17-01-2025

Registration No

8/2025

Registration Date

17-01-2025

Court

ADDL.DISTRICT COURT, BARDOLI

Judge

1-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 415(3)K
NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881 Section 138,

Petitioner(s)

RAMSAGAR MAHTO/SAKSHI PRINTS LTD

Adv. V K BHATIA

Respondent(s)

SHAILESHBHAI DHIRUBHAI NAKRANI/SHIVANI PROSESAR LTD Advocate - R V SANEPARA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

09-03-2026

FOR R&P

03-02-2026

FOR R&P

05-01-2026

FOR R&P

20-12-2025

FOR R&P

01-12-2025

FOR R&P

Interim Orders

21-01-2025
ORDER

Bail Granted with Conditions The court allowed the bail application under Section 415(3)(a) BNSS for the appellant convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appellant must furnish a surety bond of Rs. 1,00,000 and comply with conditions including: regular court attendance, submission of contact details, and payment of 20% compensation (Rs. 1,93,360) within 60 days to the complainant. The sentence remains suspended during the appeal pendency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Bail Granted with Conditions The court allowed the bail application under Section 415(3)(a) BNSS for the appellant convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appellant must furnish a surety bond of Rs. 1,00,000 and comply with conditions including: regular court attendance, submission of contact details, and payment of 20% compensation (Rs. 1,93,360) within 60 days to the complainant. The sentence remains suspended during the appeal pendency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

ADDL.DISTRICT COURT, BARDOLI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case