Government of Gujarat vs SHOYEB BHIKHAN SHA — 3106/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 303(2),. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 25th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJSR170035272025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
3119/2025
Filing Date
06-12-2025
Registration No
3106/2025
Registration Date
06-12-2025
Court
MUNICIPAL COURT, Surat
Judge
1-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, FIRST CLASS (MUNI.)
Decision Date
25th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
1378
Police Station
ATHWALINES POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
SHOYEB BHIKHAN SHA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, FIRST CLASS (MUNI.)
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 23-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 09-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 23-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 09-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Surat First Class Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted the accused Shoyeb Bhukhkan Shah of charges under IPC Section 303(2) for allegedly stealing a moped (GJ SR-05-4964) on October 20, 2025. The court found the complainant's evidence insufficient and doubtful, particularly noting the complainant witness could not identify the accused and declined further involvement in the case, making it impossible to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The accused was acquitted and ordered released, with seized property to be returned after verifying original ownership. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Surat First Class Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted the accused Shoyeb Bhukhkan Shah of charges under IPC Section 303(2) for allegedly stealing a moped (GJ SR-05-4964) on October 20, 2025. The court found the complainant's evidence insufficient and doubtful, particularly noting the complainant witness could not identify the accused and declined further involvement in the case, making it impossible to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The accused was acquitted and ordered released, with seized property to be returned after verifying original ownership. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts