KAILASHKUMAR ISHVARLAL JINAGAR PRO.OF HET TELAR vs ANILBHAI MOHANBHAI LILVANI PRO.OF JAY MATADI CREATION — 1971/2022

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJSR170025982022

Filing Number

1971/2022

Filing Date

04-Apr-2022

Registration No

1971/2022

Registration Date

04-Apr-2022

Court

MUNICIPAL COURT, Surat

Judge

1-Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 21-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KAILASHKUMAR ISHVARLAL JINAGAR PRO.OF HET TELAR

    Adv. J K PATEL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ANILBHAI MOHANBHAI LILVANI PRO.OF JAY MATADI CREATION

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Surat Judicial Magistrate acquitted the accused in a Section 138 Negotiable Instrument Act case after the parties reached a settlement through Lok Adalat. The court treated the compromise agreement as a civil decree, following Supreme Court precedent that Lok Adalat awards in criminal cases are executable as civil decrees. No costs were awarded to promote reconciliation between the parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  6. 27-Jan-2026

    Process To Accused

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  7. 12-Dec-2025

    Process To Accused

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  8. 11-Dec-2025

    Process To Accused

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  9. 01-Dec-2025

    Process To Accused

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  10. 17-Nov-2025

    Process To Accused

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  11. 10-Oct-2025

    Process To Accused

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  12. 10-Sep-2025

    Process To Accused

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  13. 04-Aug-2025

    Process To Accused

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  14. 04-Aug-2025

    Process To Accused

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  15. 11-Jun-2025

    Process To Accused

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  16. 22-Apr-2025

    Process To Accused

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  17. 21-Feb-2025

    Process To Accused

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  18. 26-Dec-2024

    Process To Accused

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  19. 28-Oct-2024

    Process To Accused

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  20. 23-Aug-2024

    Process To Accused

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  21. 21-Jun-2024

    Process To Accused

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  22. 26-Apr-2024

    Process To Accused

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  23. 02-Mar-2024

    Process To Accused

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  24. 24-Jan-2024

    Process To Accused

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  25. 07-Dec-2023

    Process To Accused

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  26. 12-Oct-2023

    Process To Accused

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  27. 14-Aug-2023

    Process To Accused

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  28. 23-Jun-2023

    Process To Accused

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  29. 08-May-2023

    Process To Accused

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  30. 20-Mar-2023

    Process To Accused

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  31. 27-Jan-2023

    Process To Accused

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  32. 07-Dec-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  33. 04-Apr-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1971/2022

casestatus.in Summary

The Surat Judicial Magistrate acquitted the accused in a Section 138 Negotiable Instrument Act case after the parties reached a settlement through Lok Adalat. The court treated the compromise agreement as a civil decree, following Supreme Court precedent that Lok Adalat awards in criminal cases are executable as civil decrees. No costs were awarded to promote reconciliation between the parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case