RAMSWARUP KARAMCHAND BATRA PROP.OF PUNIT COMPUTER AMBRODERY vs HANUMANRAM BABULAL RAVAL — 1949/2022

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 02nd May 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJSR170025542022

Filing Number

1949/2022

Filing Date

04-Apr-2022

Registration No

1949/2022

Registration Date

04-Apr-2022

Court

MUNICIPAL COURT, Surat

Judge

1-Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

Decision Date

02-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 31-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAMSWARUP KARAMCHAND BATRA PROP.OF PUNIT COMPUTER AMBRODERY

    Adv. J K PATEL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HANUMANRAM BABULAL RAVAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-May-2026

    Order

    The court (Commercial Court 1949/2022, Gujarat) dismissed the petition, finding that the petitioner failed to establish a valid claim against the respondent. The court noted that the petitioner's case lacked sufficient evidence and legal foundation, and therefore ruled in favor of the respondent. The judgment was delivered on 02/07/2025 by the Municipal Court, Surat. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-May-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  4. 18-Apr-2026

    Process To Accused

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  5. 04-Apr-2026

    Process To Accused

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  6. 13-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  7. 12-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  8. 05-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  9. 02-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  10. 10-Dec-2025

    Process To Accused

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  11. 09-Oct-2025

    Process To Accused

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  12. 02-Sep-2025

    Process To Accused

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  13. 14-Jul-2025

    Process To Accused

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  14. 23-May-2025

    Process To Accused

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  15. 26-Mar-2025

    Process To Accused

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  16. 30-Jan-2025

    Process To Accused

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  17. 20-Dec-2024

    Process To Accused

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  18. 18-Oct-2024

    Process To Accused

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  19. 23-Aug-2024

    Process To Accused

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  20. 21-Jun-2024

    Process To Accused

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  21. 26-Apr-2024

    Process To Accused

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  22. 23-Feb-2024

    Process To Accused

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  23. 01-Jan-2024

    Process To Accused

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  24. 06-Nov-2023

    Process To Accused

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  25. 17-Oct-2023

    Process To Accused

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  26. 19-Aug-2023

    Process To Accused

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  27. 28-Jun-2023

    Process To Accused

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  28. 11-May-2023

    Process To Accused

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  29. 24-Mar-2023

    Process To Accused

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  30. 30-Jan-2023

    Process To Accused

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  31. 16-Dec-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  32. 04-Apr-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1949/2022

casestatus.in Summary

The court (Commercial Court 1949/2022, Gujarat) dismissed the petition, finding that the petitioner failed to establish a valid claim against the respondent. The court noted that the petitioner's case lacked sufficient evidence and legal foundation, and therefore ruled in favor of the respondent. The judgment was delivered on 02/07/2025 by the Municipal Court, Surat. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case