Government of Gujarat vs VIPUL GOPALBHAI MAHSARIYA — 1872/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,427. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 03rd April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJSR170019542023

Filing Number

1874/2023

Filing Date

26-May-2023

Registration No

1872/2023

Registration Date

26-May-2023

Court

MUNICIPAL COURT, Surat

Judge

1-Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

Decision Date

03-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11210048230060

Police Station

UMRA POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 279,427
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 3,181

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VIPUL GOPALBHAI MAHSARIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 03-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary The Metropolitan First Class Judicial Magistrate Court in Surat acquitted the accused Vipul Mehsariya of charges under IPC Sections 279 (rash/negligent driving) and 427 (causing mischief), and MV Act Sections 3 and 181, in a motor vehicle accident case. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was driving the vehicle at the time of the accident or that the driving was rash and negligent, as the complainant could not identify the actual person who caused the collision with his parked truck. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 03-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  4. 27-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  7. 10-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  8. 23-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  9. 20-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  10. 25-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  11. 06-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  12. 26-Jun-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  13. 12-May-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  14. 12-Mar-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  15. 18-Feb-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  16. 22-Jan-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  17. 26-Nov-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  18. 21-Oct-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  19. 27-Aug-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  20. 01-Jul-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  21. 06-May-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  22. 12-Mar-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  23. 10-Jan-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  24. 29-Nov-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  25. 07-Oct-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  26. 29-Aug-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  27. 19-Jul-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  28. 02-Jun-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  29. 26-May-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1872/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Metropolitan First Class Judicial Magistrate Court in Surat acquitted the accused Vipul Mehsariya of charges under IPC Sections 279 (rash/negligent driving) and 427 (causing mischief), and MV Act Sections 3 and 181, in a motor vehicle accident case. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was driving the vehicle at the time of the accident or that the driving was rash and negligent, as the complainant could not identify the actual person who caused the collision with his parked truck. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case