SUSHANT P. MALI PROP OF LIPY ENTERPRISE vs VEDANTIKA FOODS AND PAPERS PVT LTD Advocate - D.S.SHARMA — 1485/2022

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJSR170016262022

Filing Number

1485/2022

Filing Date

17-Jun-2017

Registration No

1485/2022

Registration Date

17-Jun-2017

Court

MUNICIPAL COURT, Surat

Judge

1-Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUSHANT P. MALI PROP OF LIPY ENTERPRISE

    Adv. P.R.PANWALA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VEDANTIKA FOODS AND PAPERS PVT LTD Advocate - D.S.SHARMA

  2. 2.SUKHRAM GURDASMAL SIRVANI DIRECTOR OF VEDANTIKA FOODS AND PAPERS PVT LTD

    Adv. D.S.SHARMA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary of Court Decision The Surat Judicial Magistrate acquitted the defendants in a cheque bounce case under the Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 138. The court found that the complainant failed to prove the cheque was issued for lawful debt by the authorized company representative, as evidence showed a former director (Ajit Tilagulkar) who had resigned in 2011 executed the agreements and provided the cheque, not the current authorized representatives of the company. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  7. 09-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  8. 09-Feb-2026

    Judgement

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  9. 29-Dec-2025

    Judgement

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  10. 26-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Defence

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  11. 17-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Defence

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  12. 08-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Defence

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  13. 01-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Defence

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  14. 21-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Defence

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  15. 13-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Defence

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  16. 10-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Defence

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  17. 27-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Defence

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  18. 01-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Defence

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  19. 25-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Defence

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  20. 09-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Defence

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  21. 19-Jun-2025

    Evidence Of Defence

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  22. 16-May-2025

    Evidence Of Defence

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  23. 28-Apr-2025

    Evidence Of Defence

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  24. 12-Mar-2025

    Evidence Of Defence

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  25. 17-Jan-2025

    Evidence Of Defence

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  26. 10-Dec-2024

    Evidence Of Defence

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  27. 28-Oct-2024

    Evidence Of Defence

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  28. 23-Sep-2024

    Evidence Of Defence

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  29. 28-Aug-2024

    Evidence Of Defence

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  30. 31-Jul-2024

    Evidence Of Defence

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  31. 12-Jul-2024

    Evidence Of Defence

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  32. 01-Jun-2024

    Evidence Of Defence

    3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  33. 04-Apr-2024

    Evidence Of Defence

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  34. 24-Jan-2024

    Evidence Of Defence

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  35. 07-Dec-2023

    Evidence Of Defence

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  36. 14-Oct-2023

    Evidence Of Defence

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  37. 06-Sep-2023

    Evidence Of Defence

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  38. 24-Jul-2023

    Evidence Of Defence

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  39. 04-Jul-2023

    Evidence Of Defence

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  40. 06-Jun-2023

    Evidence Of Defence

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  41. 19-May-2023

    Evidence Of Defence

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  42. 28-Apr-2023

    Evidence Of Defence

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  43. 11-Apr-2023

    Evidence Of Defence

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  44. 29-Mar-2023

    Evidence Of Defence

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  45. 04-Feb-2023

    Evidence Of Defence

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  46. 19-Dec-2022

    Evidence Of Defence

    Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)

  47. 21-Nov-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  48. 17-Jun-2017

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1485/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Court Decision The Surat Judicial Magistrate acquitted the defendants in a cheque bounce case under the Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 138. The court found that the complainant failed to prove the cheque was issued for lawful debt by the authorized company representative, as evidence showed a former director (Ajit Tilagulkar) who had resigned in 2011 executed the agreements and provided the cheque, not the current authorized representatives of the company. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case