Government of Gujarat vs NARESHKUMAR NARAYANDAS BHARDWAJ — 333/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 454,380,511,114. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 24th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJSR170004552025
Filing Number
333/2025
Filing Date
07-05-2025
Registration No
333/2025
Registration Date
07-05-2025
Court
MUNICIPAL COURT, Surat
Judge
1-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, FIRST CLASS (MUNI.)
Decision Date
24th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
499
Police Station
UMRA POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT
Year
2003
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
NARESHKUMAR NARAYANDAS BHARDWAJ
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, FIRST CLASS (MUNI.)
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 12-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 19-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 12-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 333/2025 Court Decision: The accused, Nareshkumar Narayandas Bhardwaj, was acquitted of charges under IPC Sections 454, 380, 511, and 114 (burglary and theft of ₹13,000 in November 2003). The court found the prosecution's evidence insufficient and riddled with doubts—the complainant could not identify the actual perpetrators, only vague descriptions of unknown persons were provided, and the investigating officer conducted no proper identification parade or corroborating procedures linking the accused to the crime. The accused is discharged and bail amount refunded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 333/2025 Court Decision: The accused, Nareshkumar Narayandas Bhardwaj, was acquitted of charges under IPC Sections 454, 380, 511, and 114 (burglary and theft of ₹13,000 in November 2003). The court found the prosecution's evidence insufficient and riddled with doubts—the complainant could not identify the actual perpetrators, only vague descriptions of unknown persons were provided, and the investigating officer conducted no proper identification parade or corroborating procedures linking the accused to the crime. The accused is discharged and bail amount refunded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts