Government of Gujarat vs NARESHKUMAR NARAYANDAS BHARDWAJ — 333/2025

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 454,380,511,114. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 24th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJSR170004552025

Case disposed

Filing Number

333/2025

Filing Date

07-05-2025

Registration No

333/2025

Registration Date

07-05-2025

Court

MUNICIPAL COURT, Surat

Judge

1-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, FIRST CLASS (MUNI.)

Decision Date

24th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

499

Police Station

UMRA POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT

Year

2003

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 454,380,511,114

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

NARESHKUMAR NARAYANDAS BHARDWAJ

Hearing History

Judge: 1-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, FIRST CLASS (MUNI.)

24-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

12-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

19-02-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

12-02-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Final Orders / Judgements

24-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary: 333/2025 Court Decision: The accused, Nareshkumar Narayandas Bhardwaj, was acquitted of charges under IPC Sections 454, 380, 511, and 114 (burglary and theft of ₹13,000 in November 2003). The court found the prosecution's evidence insufficient and riddled with doubts—the complainant could not identify the actual perpetrators, only vague descriptions of unknown persons were provided, and the investigating officer conducted no proper identification parade or corroborating procedures linking the accused to the crime. The accused is discharged and bail amount refunded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 333/2025 Court Decision: The accused, Nareshkumar Narayandas Bhardwaj, was acquitted of charges under IPC Sections 454, 380, 511, and 114 (burglary and theft of ₹13,000 in November 2003). The court found the prosecution's evidence insufficient and riddled with doubts—the complainant could not identify the actual perpetrators, only vague descriptions of unknown persons were provided, and the investigating officer conducted no proper identification parade or corroborating procedures linking the accused to the crime. The accused is discharged and bail amount refunded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

MUNICIPAL COURT, Surat All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case