Government of Gujarat vs NARESHBHAI HARIBHAI AHIR — 132/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,427,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 12th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJSR170001352021
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
131/2021
Filing Date
13-01-2021
Registration No
132/2021
Registration Date
13-01-2021
Court
MUNICIPAL COURT, Surat
Judge
1-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, FIRST CLASS (MUNI.)
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11210048200866
Police Station
UMRA POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
NARESHBHAI HARIBHAI AHIR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, FIRST CLASS (MUNI.)
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 11-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 09-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 10-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 24-12-2025 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court acquitted the defendant of charges under IPC Sections 279, 427, and Motor Vehicles Act Sections 177, 184, 185 (rash/negligent driving causing vehicle damage and driving without a license), finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that witness testimony was contradictory and insufficient to establish that the defendant was responsible for hitting the complainant's vehicle on July 23, 2020, and noted the lack of corroborating evidence regarding the defendant's alleged rash driving or intoxication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court acquitted the defendant of charges under IPC Sections 279, 427, and Motor Vehicles Act Sections 177, 184, 185 (rash/negligent driving causing vehicle damage and driving without a license), finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that witness testimony was contradictory and insufficient to establish that the defendant was responsible for hitting the complainant's vehicle on July 23, 2020, and noted the lack of corroborating evidence regarding the defendant's alleged rash driving or intoxication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts