Government of Gujarat vs KRISHNAPAL HORILAL KHATIK — 5959/2025
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA, 81,. Status: PROCESS TO ACCUSED. Next hearing: 29th April 2026.
CC RLY - CRIMINAL CASE - RAILWAY
CNR: GJSR160060482025
Next Hearing
29th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
5961/2025
Filing Date
30-07-2025
Registration No
5959/2025
Registration Date
30-07-2025
Court
RAILWAY COURT, Surat
Judge
1-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS (RAILWAYS)
FIR Details
FIR Number
1801
Police Station
SURAT RLY.POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Respondent(s)
KRISHNAPAL HORILAL KHATIK
DHAVAL KANAIYALAL RANA (Plead Guilty)
ANKIT RAMNARESH YADAV
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS (RAILWAYS)
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 09-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 16-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 27-01-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 30-12-2025 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Interim Orders
Summary The accused was convicted under Section 65 of the Prohibition Act for possessing liquor and sentenced to a fine of ₹25,000 (or 6 days simple imprisonment in default). The court imposed a lenient sentence considering the accused's financial hardship, family responsibilities, and it being his first offense. Two co-accused (Krishnalal Khatik and Ankit Yadvav) were discharged and the case against them was ordered to continue. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The accused was convicted under Section 65 of the Prohibition Act for possessing liquor and sentenced to a fine of ₹25,000 (or 6 days simple imprisonment in default). The court imposed a lenient sentence considering the accused's financial hardship, family responsibilities, and it being his first offense. Two co-accused (Krishnalal Khatik and Ankit Yadvav) were discharged and the case against them was ordered to continue. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts