Government of India vs DINESH BABUBHAI DAMOR — 1734/2026

Case under Railways Act, 1989 Section 174B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC RLY - CRIMINAL CASE - RAILWAY

CNR: GJSR160017792026

Filing Number

1734/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

1734/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

RAILWAY COURT, Surat

Judge

1-Judicial Magistrate First Class (Railways)

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 12-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Railways Act, 1989 Section 174B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of India

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DINESH BABUBHAI DAMOR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Judicial Magistrate First Class (Railway) Court, Surat convicted the accused under Section 174(B) of the Railways Act, 1989. However, considering the accused's socioeconomic circumstances (poor family man supporting dependents through daily wages), the court imposed a lighter sentence than statutorily prescribed: imprisonment without rigorous punishment and a fine of ₹500, with three months' imprisonment as alternative if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate First Class (Railways)

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Judicial Magistrate First Class (Railways)

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1734/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial Magistrate First Class (Railway) Court, Surat convicted the accused under Section 174(B) of the Railways Act, 1989. However, considering the accused's socioeconomic circumstances (poor family man supporting dependents through daily wages), the court imposed a lighter sentence than statutorily prescribed: imprisonment without rigorous punishment and a fine of ₹500, with three months' imprisonment as alternative if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case