Government of Gujarat vs PRAVIN BHAGWAT THORAT — 1278/2025
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65E. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 09th March 2026.
CC RLY - CRIMINAL CASE - RAILWAY
CNR: GJSR160013322025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1280/2025
Filing Date
01-05-2025
Registration No
1278/2025
Registration Date
01-05-2025
Court
RAILWAY COURT, Surat
Judge
1-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS (RAILWAYS)
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
5350
Police Station
SURAT RLY.POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Respondent(s)
PRAVIN BHAGWAT THORAT
SAMADHAN VILAS PATIL
BADAL SHIVAJI PATIL(Absconding)
NILAMBEN BIPINBHAI PATEL
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS (RAILWAYS)
Disposed
FURTHER STATEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 23-02-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 09-02-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 02-02-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 12-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The Judicial Magistrate First Class (Railways), Surat, acquitted all four accused in case CC.1278/2025 under the Prohibition Act, Section 65(E), for alleged illegal possession of foreign liquor worth Rs. 19,200 seized on 06-07-2019. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt due to insufficient corroborating evidence, lack of independent witnesses, missing proper investigation documentation, and procedural deficiencies that cast serious doubt on the seizure's authenticity and the accused's involvement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The Judicial Magistrate First Class (Railways), Surat, acquitted all four accused in case CC.1278/2025 under the Prohibition Act, Section 65(E), for alleged illegal possession of foreign liquor worth Rs. 19,200 seized on 06-07-2019. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt due to insufficient corroborating evidence, lack of independent witnesses, missing proper investigation documentation, and procedural deficiencies that cast serious doubt on the seizure's authenticity and the accused's involvement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts