Government of Gujarat vs VINOD BHUVNESVAR GUPTA — 29/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(E), 81. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 23rd March 2026.
CC RLY - CRIMINAL CASE - RAILWAY
CNR: GJSR160000312026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
28/2026
Filing Date
02-01-2026
Registration No
29/2026
Registration Date
02-01-2026
Court
RAILWAY COURT, Surat
Judge
1-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS (RAILWAYS)
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11212051251927
Police Station
SURAT RLY.POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Respondent(s)
VINOD BHUVNESVAR GUPTA
ROSHANIBEN RAJNISHBHAI HINGALE
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS (RAILWAYS)
Disposed
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 16-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 09-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 23-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 02-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Court Decision The JMFC (Railways) Surat court acquitted both defendants (Vinod Bhuwaneshwar Gupta and Roshniben Hingale) of charges under the Prohibition Act sections 65(E) and 81, finding insufficient credible evidence that they unlawfully possessed English liquor worth ₹97,370 on 25 October 2025. The court noted critical weaknesses in the prosecution's case, including inadequate panchnama (witness record) corroboration, lack of independent witness testimony, and failure to establish the contraband's foreign origin convincingly, thereby benefiting the accused under the presumption of innocence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Court Decision The JMFC (Railways) Surat court acquitted both defendants (Vinod Bhuwaneshwar Gupta and Roshniben Hingale) of charges under the Prohibition Act sections 65(E) and 81, finding insufficient credible evidence that they unlawfully possessed English liquor worth ₹97,370 on 25 October 2025. The court noted critical weaknesses in the prosecution's case, including inadequate panchnama (witness record) corroboration, lack of independent witness testimony, and failure to establish the contraband's foreign origin convincingly, thereby benefiting the accused under the presumption of innocence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts