Government of Gujarat vs VINOD BHUVNESVAR GUPTA — 29/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(E), 81. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 23rd March 2026.
CC RLY - CRIMINAL CASE - RAILWAY
CNR: GJSR160000312026
Filing Number
28/2026
Filing Date
02-Jan-2026
Registration No
29/2026
Registration Date
02-Jan-2026
Court
RAILWAY COURT, Surat
Judge
1-Judicial Magistrate First Class (Railways)
Decision Date
23-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 16-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11212051251927
Police Station
SURAT RLY.POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Respondent(s)
-
1.VINOD BHUVNESVAR GUPTA
-
2.ROSHANIBEN RAJNISHBHAI HINGALE
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary of Court Decision The JMFC (Railways) Surat court acquitted both defendants (Vinod Bhuwaneshwar Gupta and Roshniben Hingale) of charges under the Prohibition Act sections 65(E) and 81, finding insufficient credible evidence that they unlawfully possessed English liquor worth ₹97,370 on 25 October 2025. The court noted critical weaknesses in the prosecution's case, including inadequate panchnama (witness record) corroboration, lack of independent witness testimony, and failure to establish the contraband's foreign origin convincingly, thereby benefiting the accused under the presumption of innocence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judicial Magistrate First Class (Railways)
-
16-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Judicial Magistrate First Class (Railways)
-
09-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Judicial Magistrate First Class (Railways)
-
23-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Judicial Magistrate First Class (Railways)
-
02-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 29/2026
Summary of Court Decision The JMFC (Railways) Surat court acquitted both defendants (Vinod Bhuwaneshwar Gupta and Roshniben Hingale) of charges under the Prohibition Act sections 65(E) and 81, finding insufficient credible evidence that they unlawfully possessed English liquor worth ₹97,370 on 25 October 2025. The court noted critical weaknesses in the prosecution's case, including inadequate panchnama (witness record) corroboration, lack of independent witness testimony, and failure to establish the contraband's foreign origin convincingly, thereby benefiting the accused under the presumption of innocence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts