SHRI R. S. GAMIT, GOVERNMENT LABOUR OFFICER AND BONUS PAYMENT INSPECTOR, SURAT vs SHREE SACHIDANAND INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD., (COMPANY) — 1041/2025
Case under Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 Section 27(4),. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJSR140032452025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1041/2025
Filing Date
04-10-2025
Registration No
1041/2025
Registration Date
04-10-2025
Court
LABOUR COURT, SURAT
Judge
1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHRI R. S. GAMIT, GOVERNMENT LABOUR OFFICER AND BONUS PAYMENT INSPECTOR, SURAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
SHREE SACHIDANAND INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD., (COMPANY)
SHRI RADHESHYAM RAJARAM JAJOO, (DIRECTOR)
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT
Disposed
PLEA
PLEA
PLEA
PLEA
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 13-03-2026 | PLEA | |
| 07-03-2026 | PLEA | |
| 21-02-2026 | PLEA | |
| 03-01-2026 | PLEA |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Surat Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate's court found both accused — Sachchidanand Industries Pvt. Ltd. and its Director Radheshyam RajaRAM Jaju — guilty of violating Section 27(4) of the Bonus Payment Act, 1965. The court accepted their voluntary confession and sentenced each accused to pay a fine of ₹1,000 (or 10 days simple imprisonment in default), with a total recovery of ₹2,000, considering the nature and severity of the offense and the accused's socioeconomic circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Surat Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate's court found both accused — Sachchidanand Industries Pvt. Ltd. and its Director Radheshyam RajaRAM Jaju — guilty of violating Section 27(4) of the Bonus Payment Act, 1965. The court accepted their voluntary confession and sentenced each accused to pay a fine of ₹1,000 (or 10 days simple imprisonment in default), with a total recovery of ₹2,000, considering the nature and severity of the offense and the accused's socioeconomic circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts