SHRI S. S. SHAH, GOVERNMENT LABOUR OFFICER AND BONUS PAYMENT INSPECTOR, SURAT vs CBRE SOUTH ASIA PVT. LTD., (COMPANY) Advocate - M G RATHOD — 866/2025
Case under Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 Section 27(4),. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJSR140028382025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
866/2025
Filing Date
02-09-2025
Registration No
866/2025
Registration Date
02-09-2025
Court
LABOUR COURT, SURAT
Judge
1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHRI S. S. SHAH, GOVERNMENT LABOUR OFFICER AND BONUS PAYMENT INSPECTOR, SURAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
CBRE SOUTH ASIA PVT. LTD., (COMPANY) Advocate - M G RATHOD
SHRI RAJESH PANDIT, (DIRECTOR)
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT
Disposed
PLEA
PLEA
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 13-03-2026 | PLEA | |
| 07-03-2026 | PLEA | |
| 17-01-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 29-11-2025 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: CC No. 866/2025 The Surat Labour Court convicted CBRE South Asia Pvt. Ltd. and its authorized representative Rajesh Pandit under Section 27(4) of the Bonus Act, 1965 for unauthorized bonus non-payment. The court found the defendants guilty of violating bonus payment regulations and sentenced each to a fine of ₹2,000 (or 10 days simple imprisonment if unpaid), considering mitigating factors and the defendants' lack of criminal intent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CC No. 866/2025 The Surat Labour Court convicted CBRE South Asia Pvt. Ltd. and its authorized representative Rajesh Pandit under Section 27(4) of the Bonus Act, 1965 for unauthorized bonus non-payment. The court found the defendants guilty of violating bonus payment regulations and sentenced each to a fine of ₹2,000 (or 10 days simple imprisonment if unpaid), considering mitigating factors and the defendants' lack of criminal intent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts