SHRI S. S. SHAH, GOVERNMENT LABOUR OFFICER AND BONUS PAYMENT INSPECTOR, SURAT vs CBRE SOUTH ASIA PVT. LTD., (COMPANY) Advocate - M G RATHOD — 866/2025

Case under Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 Section 27(4). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJSR140028382025

Filing Number

866/2025

Filing Date

02-Sep-2025

Registration No

866/2025

Registration Date

02-Sep-2025

Court

LABOUR COURT, SURAT

Judge

1-Judge, Labour Court

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 03-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 Section 27(4)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHRI S. S. SHAH, GOVERNMENT LABOUR OFFICER AND BONUS PAYMENT INSPECTOR, SURAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.CBRE SOUTH ASIA PVT. LTD., (COMPANY) Advocate - M G RATHOD

  2. 2.SHRI RAJESH PANDIT, (DIRECTOR)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: CC No. 866/2025 The Surat Labour Court convicted CBRE South Asia Pvt. Ltd. and its authorized representative Rajesh Pandit under Section 27(4) of the Bonus Act, 1965 for unauthorized bonus non-payment. The court found the defendants guilty of violating bonus payment regulations and sentenced each to a fine of ₹2,000 (or 10 days simple imprisonment if unpaid), considering mitigating factors and the defendants' lack of criminal intent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judge, Labour Court

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Plea

    Judge, Labour Court

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Plea

    Judge, Labour Court

  6. 17-Jan-2026

    Process To Accused

    Judge, Labour Court

  7. 29-Nov-2025

    Process To Accused

    Judge, Labour Court

  8. 18-Oct-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 02-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 866/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CC No. 866/2025 The Surat Labour Court convicted CBRE South Asia Pvt. Ltd. and its authorized representative Rajesh Pandit under Section 27(4) of the Bonus Act, 1965 for unauthorized bonus non-payment. The court found the defendants guilty of violating bonus payment regulations and sentenced each to a fine of ₹2,000 (or 10 days simple imprisonment if unpaid), considering mitigating factors and the defendants' lack of criminal intent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case