SHRI S. A. CHAUHAN, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR AND INSPECTOR OF FACTORIES vs SHRI DILIP OOMMEN, (OCCUPIERSHRI) Advocate - M V PATEL — 817/2025
Case under Factories Act, 1948 Section 7A(2)(A). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJSR140027172025
Filing Number
817/2025
Filing Date
28-Aug-2025
Registration No
817/2025
Registration Date
28-Aug-2025
Court
LABOUR COURT, SURAT
Judge
1-Judge, Labour Court
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Last updated 03-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHRI S. A. CHAUHAN, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR AND INSPECTOR OF FACTORIES
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.SHRI DILIP OOMMEN, (OCCUPIERSHRI) Advocate - M V PATEL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: CC No. 817/2025 The Surat Labour Court convicted the authorized representative of ArcelorMittal Nippon Steel India Ltd. under Section 7-A(2)(A) of the Factories Act, 1948, for workplace violations resulting in worker injuries. The court imposed a fine of ₹50,000 and sentenced the representative to simple imprisonment for one month if the fine remains unpaid, considering the company's prior compensation to the injured workers' families and applying judicial leniency principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judge, Labour Court
-
13-Mar-2026
Plea
Judge, Labour Court
-
10-Mar-2026
Plea
Judge, Labour Court
-
07-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Judge, Labour Court
-
31-Jan-2026
Process To Accused
Judge, Labour Court
-
12-Dec-2025
Process To Accused
Judge, Labour Court
-
06-Dec-2025
Process To Accused
Judge, Labour Court
-
10-Oct-2025
Process To Accused
Judge, Labour Court
-
13-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 817/2025
Case Summary: CC No. 817/2025 The Surat Labour Court convicted the authorized representative of ArcelorMittal Nippon Steel India Ltd. under Section 7-A(2)(A) of the Factories Act, 1948, for workplace violations resulting in worker injuries. The court imposed a fine of ₹50,000 and sentenced the representative to simple imprisonment for one month if the fine remains unpaid, considering the company's prior compensation to the injured workers' families and applying judicial leniency principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts