SARJU MAHADEV NONIYA vs KASA SECURITY SERVICES — 86/2024
Case under Payment of Wages Act,1936 Section 15,. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 23rd March 2026.
PWAPP-LC - P.W. APPLICATION
CNR: GJSR140018632024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
86/2024
Filing Date
04-09-2024
Registration No
86/2024
Registration Date
04-09-2024
Court
LABOUR COURT, SURAT
Judge
4-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SARJU MAHADEV NONIYA
Adv. RAVINDRA OAK
Respondent(s)
KASA SECURITY SERVICES
Hearing History
Judge: 4-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT
Disposed
For Evidence of Applicant
For Evidence of Applicant
For Evidence of Applicant
For Evidence of Applicant
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | For Evidence of Applicant | |
| 19-01-2026 | For Evidence of Applicant | |
| 08-12-2025 | For Evidence of Applicant | |
| 13-10-2025 | For Evidence of Applicant |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court dismissed the petitioner's appeal for wage recovery under Section 15 of the Wage Act, as the petitioner failed to appear before the court for an extended period and made no effort to pursue the case. The court found that without proper diligence, sufficient grounds, or supporting documents from the petitioner, the appeal could not proceed and was dismissed due to abandonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court dismissed the petitioner's appeal for wage recovery under Section 15 of the Wage Act, as the petitioner failed to appear before the court for an extended period and made no effort to pursue the case. The court found that without proper diligence, sufficient grounds, or supporting documents from the petitioner, the appeal could not proceed and was dismissed due to abandonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts