SARJU MAHADEV NONIYA vs KASA SECURITY SERVICES — 86/2024

Case under Payment of Wages Act,1936 Section 15. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

PWAPP-LC - P.W. APPLICATION

CNR: GJSR140018632024

Filing Number

86/2024

Filing Date

04-Sep-2024

Registration No

86/2024

Registration Date

04-Sep-2024

Court

LABOUR COURT, SURAT

Judge

4-Judge, Labour Court

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Payment of Wages Act,1936 Section 15

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SARJU MAHADEV NONIYA

    Adv. RAVINDRA OAK

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KASA SECURITY SERVICES

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court dismissed the petitioner's appeal for wage recovery under Section 15 of the Wage Act, as the petitioner failed to appear before the court for an extended period and made no effort to pursue the case. The court found that without proper diligence, sufficient grounds, or supporting documents from the petitioner, the appeal could not proceed and was dismissed due to abandonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judge, Labour Court

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  5. 19-Jan-2026

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  6. 08-Dec-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  7. 13-Oct-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  8. 25-Aug-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  9. 07-Jul-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  10. 12-May-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  11. 24-Mar-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  12. 27-Jan-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  13. 16-Dec-2024

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  14. 14-Oct-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  15. 04-Sep-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 86/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the petitioner's appeal for wage recovery under Section 15 of the Wage Act, as the petitioner failed to appear before the court for an extended period and made no effort to pursue the case. The court found that without proper diligence, sufficient grounds, or supporting documents from the petitioner, the appeal could not proceed and was dismissed due to abandonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case