KRUSHNAKUMAR JAGDISH MAHTO vs HARIOM ENGINEERING, (OWNERSHRI SHABHU BHAGAT) — 9/2022
Case under Payment of Wages Act,1936 Section DELAY. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 07th March 2026.
PW-MIS-LC - P.W. MISC. APPLICATION UNDER RULE
CNR: GJSR140018412022
Filing Number
9/2022
Filing Date
03-Nov-2022
Registration No
9/2022
Registration Date
03-Nov-2022
Court
LABOUR COURT, SURAT
Judge
1-Judge, Labour Court
Decision Date
07-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT
Last updated 03-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KRUSHNAKUMAR JAGDISH MAHTO
Adv. RAVINDRA OAK
Respondent(s)
-
1.HARIOM ENGINEERING, (OWNERSHRI SHABHU BHAGAT)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary The Surat Labour Court (Payment of Wages Act) approved the delayed filing of a wage recovery petition by employee Krishnakumar Jagdish Mahto against Hariom Engineering. The employee was terminated without cause on 23/03/2020 and denied three months and 23 days of pending wages. The court excused the delay in filing, attributing it to COVID-19 lockdown restrictions and court closure, and accepted the wage claim petition for adjudication with proceedings to resume on 07/04/2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judge, Labour Court
-
05-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
02-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
27-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
20-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
23-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
31-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
03-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
26-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
29-Oct-2025
Evidence Of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
17-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
25-Aug-2025
Evidence Of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
08-Aug-2025
Evidence Of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
04-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
23-May-2025
Evidence Of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
07-Mar-2025
Evidence Of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
27-Dec-2024
Evidence Of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
18-Oct-2024
Evidence Of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
09-Aug-2024
Evidence Of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
17-May-2024
Reply
Judge, Labour Court
-
15-Mar-2024
Reply
Judge, Labour Court
-
12-Jan-2024
Reply
Judge, Labour Court
-
24-Nov-2023
Reply
Judge, Labour Court
-
22-Sep-2023
Reply
Judge, Labour Court
-
21-Jul-2023
Reply
Judge, Labour Court
-
09-Jun-2023
Reply
Judge, Labour Court
-
07-Apr-2023
Notice To Opponents
Judge, Labour Court
-
27-Jan-2023
Notice To Opponents
Judge, Labour Court
-
03-Dec-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Nov-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 9/2022
Summary The Surat Labour Court (Payment of Wages Act) approved the delayed filing of a wage recovery petition by employee Krishnakumar Jagdish Mahto against Hariom Engineering. The employee was terminated without cause on 23/03/2020 and denied three months and 23 days of pending wages. The court excused the delay in filing, attributing it to COVID-19 lockdown restrictions and court closure, and accepted the wage claim petition for adjudication with proceedings to resume on 07/04/2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts