SANJAY SITARAM vs VAISHALI SILK MILLS PVT. LTD. Advocate - H.M.DESAI — 63/2019

Judegement

Case Summary: 63/2019 - Sanjay Sitaram v. Vaishali Silk Mills Pvt. Ltd. The court partially allowed the petitioner's recovery application under the Industrial Disputes Act. The petitioner, employed as a jat operator since 2000, was illegally dismissed on 26/05/2008 without notice or hearing. The court awarded him 30% of pending wages (₹2,99,238) plus ₹1,000 case cost, with 6% annual interest on the unpaid amount until payment, to be paid within 30 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Disposed

Judge, Labour Court

For Order

Judge, Labour Court

For Arguement of opponent

Judge, Labour Court

For Arguement of opponent

Judge, Labour Court

For Arguement of opponent

Judge, Labour Court

For Arguement of Applicant

Judge, Labour Court

For Evidence of Applicant

Judge, Labour Court

For Evidence of Applicant

Judge, Labour Court

For Evidence of Applicant

Judge, Labour Court

For Evidence of Applicant

Judge, Labour Court

For Evidence of Applicant

Judge, Labour Court

For Evidence of Applicant

Judge, Labour Court

For Evidence of Applicant

Judge, Labour Court

For Evidence of Applicant

Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

For Evidence of Applicant

Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

For Evidence of Applicant

Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

For Evidence of Applicant

Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

For Evidence of Applicant

Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

For Evidence of Applicant

Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

For Evidence of Applicant

Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

For Evidence of Applicant

Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

For Evidence of Applicant

Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

For Reply of opponent

Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

For Reply of opponent

Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

For Reply of opponent

Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

For Reply of opponent

Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

For Reply of opponent

Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

For Reply of opponent

Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

For Reply of opponent

Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

For Reply of opponent

Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

For Reply of opponent

Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

For Reply of opponent

Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

For Reply of opponent

Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

For Arguement of Applicant

Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

For Arguement of Applicant

Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

For Arguement of Applicant

Vacant Court

For Arguement of Applicant

Judge, Labour Court

For Arguement of Applicant

Judge, Labour Court

For Reply of opponent

Judge, Labour Court

For Reply of opponent

Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

For Reply of opponent

Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

For Reply of opponent

Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

For Reply of opponent

Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

For Reply of opponent

Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

For Reply of opponent

Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

For Reply of opponent

Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

For Reply of opponent

Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

For Reply of opponent

Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

For Reply of opponent

Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

For Reply of opponent

Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

For Reply of opponent

Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

For Reply of opponent

Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

For Reply of opponent

Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

For Reply of opponent

Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

For Reply of opponent

Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

For Reply of opponent

Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

For Reply of opponent

Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

For Reply of opponent

Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

For Reply of opponent

Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

For Reply of opponent

Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

For Reply of opponent

Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

For Reply of opponent

Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

For Reply of opponent

Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

For Reply of opponent

Judge, Labour Court

For Reply of opponent

Judge, Labour Court

For Reply of opponent

Judge, Labour Court

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled

Case filed

Registration No. 63/2019