ARVIND BUDI PRASAD vs VAISHALI SILK MILLS PVT. LTD. Advocate - H.M.DESAI — 62/2019
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 33C(2). Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 24th April 2026.
RECO33C2-LC - RECOVERY 33C (2)
CNR: GJSR140014202019
Filing Number
62/2019
Filing Date
13-May-2019
Registration No
62/2019
Registration Date
13-May-2019
Court
LABOUR COURT, SURAT
Judge
2-Judge, Labour Court
Decision Date
24-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGEMENT
Last updated 31-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ARVIND BUDI PRASAD
Adv. DIPAKBHAI K. PIPRODIYA
Respondent(s)
-
1.VAISHALI SILK MILLS PVT. LTD. Advocate - H.M.DESAI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: 62/2019 (Arvind Budi Prasad v. Vaishali Silk Mills Pvt. Ltd.) Court Decision: The court partially allowed the petitioner's recovery application. The court found that petitioner Arvind Budi Prasad was an employee of Vaishali Silk Mills and was illegally terminated on 26/05/2008 without notice. The court awarded him 30% of outstanding wages plus 6% simple interest from the application date, Rs. 1,000 as case costs, and ordered reinstatement or equivalent relief as per the earlier labor court judgment (T. Case 532/2008). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Apr-2026
Disposed
Judge, Labour Court
-
03-Apr-2026
For Order
Judge, Labour Court
-
13-Mar-2026
For Arguement of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
13-Feb-2026
For Arguement of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
23-Jan-2026
For Arguement of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
16-Jan-2026
For Arguement of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
26-Dec-2025
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
05-Dec-2025
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
21-Nov-2025
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
07-Nov-2025
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
19-Sep-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
22-Aug-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
18-Jul-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
09-Jun-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
05-May-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
24-Mar-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
17-Feb-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
20-Jan-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
23-Dec-2024
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
25-Nov-2024
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
04-Nov-2024
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
14-Oct-2024
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
23-Sep-2024
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
29-Jul-2024
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
24-Jun-2024
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
29-Apr-2024
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
18-Mar-2024
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
16-Feb-2024
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
12-Jan-2024
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
15-Dec-2023
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
03-Nov-2023
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
06-Oct-2023
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
01-Sep-2023
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
21-Jul-2023
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
09-Jun-2023
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
05-May-2023
For Reply of opponent
Vacant Court
-
20-Mar-2023
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
03-Feb-2023
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
19-Dec-2022
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
03-Oct-2022
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
01-Aug-2022
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
30-May-2022
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
21-Mar-2022
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
07-Feb-2022
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
27-Dec-2021
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
15-Nov-2021
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
21-Sep-2021
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
27-Jul-2021
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
15-Jun-2021
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
04-May-2021
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
02-Mar-2021
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
25-Jan-2021
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
28-Dec-2020
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
09-Nov-2020
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
05-Oct-2020
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
24-Aug-2020
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
13-Jul-2020
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
04-May-2020
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
23-Mar-2020
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
24-Feb-2020
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
20-Jan-2020
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
16-Dec-2019
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
11-Nov-2019
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
14-Oct-2019
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
26-Aug-2019
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
29-Jul-2019
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
17-Jun-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-May-2019
Case filed
Registration No. 62/2019
Case Summary: 62/2019 (Arvind Budi Prasad v. Vaishali Silk Mills Pvt. Ltd.) Court Decision: The court partially allowed the petitioner's recovery application. The court found that petitioner Arvind Budi Prasad was an employee of Vaishali Silk Mills and was illegally terminated on 26/05/2008 without notice. The court awarded him 30% of outstanding wages plus 6% simple interest from the application date, Rs. 1,000 as case costs, and ordered reinstatement or equivalent relief as per the earlier labor court judgment (T. Case 532/2008). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts