SALAMGIR NASRUDDIN ANSARI vs MANAGERSHRI/ADMINISTRATOR/CONTRACTORSHRI, RUSHI HARSH INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD. Advocate - M B KHAKHARIYA — 58/2024

Case under Payment of Wages Act,1936 Section 15(2). Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

PWAPP-LC - P.W. APPLICATION

CNR: GJSR140013192024

Filing Number

58/2024

Filing Date

21-Jun-2024

Registration No

58/2024

Registration Date

21-Jun-2024

Court

LABOUR COURT, SURAT

Judge

4-Judge, Labour Court

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Payment of Wages Act,1936 Section 15(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SALAMGIR NASRUDDIN ANSARI

    Adv. SANTOSH P. PANIGRAHI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MANAGERSHRI/ADMINISTRATOR/CONTRACTORSHRI, RUSHI HARSH INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD. Advocate - M B KHAKHARIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court dismissed the appellant's petition due to non-prosecution, as the appellant failed to appear before the court, submit required documents, or pursue the case despite multiple opportunities. The court found no merit in the appellant's claim for wage recovery under Section 15(2) of the Wage Payment Act, as the appellant did not establish proper grounds or evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judge, Labour Court

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  5. 19-Jan-2026

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  6. 01-Dec-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  7. 13-Oct-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  8. 25-Aug-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  9. 07-Jul-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  10. 12-May-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  11. 24-Mar-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  12. 03-Feb-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  13. 16-Dec-2024

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  14. 21-Oct-2024

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  15. 09-Sep-2024

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  16. 29-Jul-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  17. 21-Jun-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 58/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the appellant's petition due to non-prosecution, as the appellant failed to appear before the court, submit required documents, or pursue the case despite multiple opportunities. The court found no merit in the appellant's claim for wage recovery under Section 15(2) of the Wage Payment Act, as the appellant did not establish proper grounds or evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case