SALAMGIR NASRUDDIN ANSARI vs MANAGERSHRI/ADMINISTRATOR/CONTRACTORSHRI, RUSHI HARSH INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD. Advocate - M B KHAKHARIYA — 58/2024
Case under Payment of Wages Act,1936 Section 15(2). Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 23rd March 2026.
PWAPP-LC - P.W. APPLICATION
CNR: GJSR140013192024
Filing Number
58/2024
Filing Date
21-Jun-2024
Registration No
58/2024
Registration Date
21-Jun-2024
Court
LABOUR COURT, SURAT
Judge
4-Judge, Labour Court
Decision Date
23-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Last updated 16-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SALAMGIR NASRUDDIN ANSARI
Adv. SANTOSH P. PANIGRAHI
Respondent(s)
-
1.MANAGERSHRI/ADMINISTRATOR/CONTRACTORSHRI, RUSHI HARSH INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD. Advocate - M B KHAKHARIYA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The court dismissed the appellant's petition due to non-prosecution, as the appellant failed to appear before the court, submit required documents, or pursue the case despite multiple opportunities. The court found no merit in the appellant's claim for wage recovery under Section 15(2) of the Wage Payment Act, as the appellant did not establish proper grounds or evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judge, Labour Court
-
09-Mar-2026
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
19-Jan-2026
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
01-Dec-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
13-Oct-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
25-Aug-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
07-Jul-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
12-May-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
24-Mar-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
03-Feb-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
16-Dec-2024
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
21-Oct-2024
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
09-Sep-2024
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
29-Jul-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Jun-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 58/2024
The court dismissed the appellant's petition due to non-prosecution, as the appellant failed to appear before the court, submit required documents, or pursue the case despite multiple opportunities. The court found no merit in the appellant's claim for wage recovery under Section 15(2) of the Wage Payment Act, as the appellant did not establish proper grounds or evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts