SHRI VIREDRA PASVAN FOR PARISHISHT-WPRKERS DIRECTOR OF A vs LARSEN AND TURBO Advocate - N B SHAH — 159/2020
Case under Payment of Wages Act,1936 Section 15. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 30th March 2026.
PWAPP-LC - P.W. APPLICATION
CNR: GJSR140012282020
Filing Number
159/2020
Filing Date
11-Dec-2020
Registration No
159/2020
Registration Date
11-Dec-2020
Court
LABOUR COURT, SURAT
Judge
1-Judge, Labour Court
Decision Date
30-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT
Last updated 16-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHRI VIREDRA PASVAN FOR PARISHISHT-WPRKERS DIRECTOR OF A
Adv. VIREDRA PASVAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.LARSEN AND TURBO Advocate - N B SHAH
-
2.RANG ENGINEERS
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary of Court Decision The Labor Court of Surat rejected the worker's application under Section 15 of the Payment of Wages Act, 1936, holding that the applicant failed to provide sufficient evidence to prove his claim for pending wages and other statutory benefits from the employer. The court found that the worker did not substantiate his allegations through testimony or documentary proof, and therefore dismissed the petition as unproven. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judge, Labour Court
-
25-Mar-2026
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
18-Mar-2026
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
09-Mar-2026
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
09-Feb-2026
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
12-Jan-2026
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
22-Dec-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
08-Dec-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
14-Nov-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
03-Oct-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
29-Aug-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
11-Jul-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
30-May-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
18-Apr-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
07-Feb-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
06-Dec-2024
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
27-Sep-2024
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
23-Aug-2024
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
12-Jul-2024
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
26-Apr-2024
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
01-Mar-2024
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
19-Jan-2024
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
15-Dec-2023
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
13-Oct-2023
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
25-Aug-2023
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
09-Jun-2023
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
07-Apr-2023
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
20-Jan-2023
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
25-Nov-2022
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
07-Oct-2022
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
29-Jul-2022
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
10-Jun-2022
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
22-Apr-2022
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
12-Mar-2022
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
25-Feb-2022
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
07-Jan-2022
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
12-Nov-2021
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
24-Sep-2021
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
20-Aug-2021
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
09-Jul-2021
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
21-May-2021
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
12-Mar-2021
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
15-Jan-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Dec-2020
Case filed
Registration No. 159/2020
Summary of Court Decision The Labor Court of Surat rejected the worker's application under Section 15 of the Payment of Wages Act, 1936, holding that the applicant failed to provide sufficient evidence to prove his claim for pending wages and other statutory benefits from the employer. The court found that the worker did not substantiate his allegations through testimony or documentary proof, and therefore dismissed the petition as unproven. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts