URMILABEN RANA AND OTHER WORKERS AS PER ANNEX vs ( — 185/2019

Case under Payment of Wages Act,1936 Section 15. Status: For Evidence of Applicant. Next hearing: 07th August 2026.

For Evidence of Applicant Next hearing 07-Aug-2026

PWAPP-LC - P.W. APPLICATION

CNR: GJSR140010022019

Filing Number

185/2019

Filing Date

09-Apr-2019

Registration No

185/2019

Registration Date

09-Apr-2019

Court

LABOUR COURT, SURAT

Judge

1-Judge, Labour Court

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Payment of Wages Act,1936 Section 15

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.URMILABEN RANA AND OTHER WORKERS AS PER ANNEX

    Adv. URMILABEN RANA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.(

  2. 2.S VINODKUMAR PVT. LTD. (OLD NAME) (

  3. 3.SHRUSTI JAMS (OLD NAME) (

  4. 4.SPARKLE IMPEX (NEW NAME)

Case History

  1. 07-Aug-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 23-Jun-2026

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  3. 26-May-2026

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  4. 21-Apr-2026

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  6. 17-Feb-2026

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  7. 23-Jan-2026

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  8. 19-Dec-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  9. 18-Nov-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  10. 28-Oct-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  11. 23-Sep-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  12. 02-Sep-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  13. 12-Aug-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  14. 08-Jul-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  15. 03-Jun-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  16. 06-May-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  17. 01-Apr-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  18. 18-Feb-2025

    OrderView PDF

    Summary of Case 185/2019 In this labor dispute under the Payment of Wages Act, 1936, workers (led by Urmilaben Rana) filed a petition against S Vinodkumar Pvt. Ltd. and Shrusti Jams. The court found that the petitioners failed to provide primary documentary evidence that the respondent company unlawfully sold machinery or transferred assets to avoid wage payment obligations. The petition was dismissed, with the court ordering respondents to bear their own legal costs and petitioners to cover respondent's costs, as the case lacked sufficient evidentiary foundation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  19. 18-Feb-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  20. 21-Jan-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  21. 24-Dec-2024

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  22. 20-Nov-2024

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  23. 16-Oct-2024

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  24. 11-Sep-2024

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  25. 07-Aug-2024

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  26. 10-Jul-2024

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  27. 12-Jun-2024

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  28. 01-May-2024

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  29. 27-Mar-2024

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  30. 28-Feb-2024

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  31. 08-Feb-2024

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  32. 11-Jan-2024

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  33. 07-Dec-2023

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  34. 26-Oct-2023

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  35. 21-Sep-2023

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  36. 03-Aug-2023

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  37. 22-Jun-2023

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  38. 18-May-2023

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Vacant Court

  39. 07-Apr-2023

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  40. 29-Mar-2023

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  41. 06-Mar-2023

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  42. 27-Jan-2023

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  43. 19-Dec-2022

    For Hering of Ex.2 (Attechment Before Judgement)

    Judge, Labour Court

  44. 10-Oct-2022

    For Hering of Ex.2 (Attechment Before Judgement)

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  45. 29-Aug-2022

    For Hering of Ex.2 (Attechment Before Judgement)

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  46. 11-Jul-2022

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  47. 23-May-2022

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  48. 18-Apr-2022

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  49. 06-Apr-2022

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  50. 16-Feb-2022

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  51. 19-Jan-2022

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  52. 15-Dec-2021

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  53. 20-Oct-2021

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  54. 08-Sep-2021

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  55. 28-Jul-2021

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  56. 23-Jun-2021

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  57. 02-Jun-2021

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  58. 05-May-2021

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  59. 17-Mar-2021

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  60. 17-Feb-2021

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  61. 20-Jan-2021

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  62. 23-Dec-2020

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  63. 25-Nov-2020

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  64. 14-Oct-2020

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  65. 23-Sep-2020

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  66. 19-Aug-2020

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  67. 08-Jul-2020

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  68. 17-Jun-2020

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  69. 08-Apr-2020

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  70. 04-Mar-2020

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  71. 05-Feb-2020

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  72. 08-Jan-2020

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  73. 10-Dec-2019

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  74. 11-Nov-2019

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  75. 30-Sep-2019

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  76. 05-Aug-2019

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  77. 17-Jun-2019

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  78. 29-Apr-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  79. 09-Apr-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. 185/2019

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 185/2019 In this labor dispute under the Payment of Wages Act, 1936, workers (led by Urmilaben Rana) filed a petition against S Vinodkumar Pvt. Ltd. and Shrusti Jams. The court found that the petitioners failed to provide primary documentary evidence that the respondent company unlawfully sold machinery or transferred assets to avoid wage payment obligations. The petition was dismissed, with the court ordering respondents to bear their own legal costs and petitioners to cover respondent's costs, as the case lacked sufficient evidentiary foundation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case