SHRI J. N. VASAVA, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR AND INSPECTOR OF FACTORIES vs SHRI NARAYAN S. ASHOPA, (MANAGERSHRI) — 219/2026

Case under Factories Act, 1948 Section 61,87. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJSR140003582026

Filing Number

219/2026

Filing Date

04-Feb-2026

Registration No

219/2026

Registration Date

04-Feb-2026

Court

LABOUR COURT, SURAT

Judge

1-Judge, Labour Court

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 03-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Factories Act, 1948 Section 61,87

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHRI J. N. VASAVA, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR AND INSPECTOR OF FACTORIES

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHRI NARAYAN S. ASHOPA, (MANAGERSHRI)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary The Surat Labour Court found the accused factory manager guilty of violating the Factories Act, 1948 (Section 61) read with Gujarat Factories Rules, 1963 (Rule 87). The court accepted the accused's voluntary plea of guilt and sentenced him to pay a fine of ₹7,000 (or 10 days simple imprisonment in default) rather than imposing a harsher penalty, considering his early confession and lack of prior criminal history. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judge, Labour Court

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Plea

    Judge, Labour Court

  5. 21-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 04-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 219/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Surat Labour Court found the accused factory manager guilty of violating the Factories Act, 1948 (Section 61) read with Gujarat Factories Rules, 1963 (Rule 87). The court accepted the accused's voluntary plea of guilt and sentenced him to pay a fine of ₹7,000 (or 10 days simple imprisonment in default) rather than imposing a harsher penalty, considering his early confession and lack of prior criminal history. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case