SHRI S. S. SHAH, GOVERNMENT LABOUR OFFICER AND EQUAL REMUNERATION ACT INSPECTOR, SURAT vs PEGASUS A UNIT OF VISUAL MOTORS PRIVATE LIMITED COMPANY — 148/2026

Case under The Equal Remuneration Act, 1976 Section 6. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJSR140002772026

Filing Number

148/2026

Filing Date

23-Jan-2026

Registration No

148/2026

Registration Date

23-Jan-2026

Court

LABOUR COURT, SURAT

Judge

4-Judge, Labour Court

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 22-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

The Equal Remuneration Act, 1976 Section 6

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHRI S. S. SHAH, GOVERNMENT LABOUR OFFICER AND EQUAL REMUNERATION ACT INSPECTOR, SURAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PEGASUS A UNIT OF VISUAL MOTORS PRIVATE LIMITED COMPANY

  2. 2.SHRI PRACHIR RAMRATAN AGRAWAL, (DIRECTORSHRI)

    Adv. N B SHAH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court convicted two accused under the Equal Remuneration Act, 1976 and Gujarat Rules, 1976 (Rule 6) for violating equal pay provisions for employees of a private hospital. Each accused was sentenced to a fine of ₹5,000 with a one-month simple imprisonment in default, and directed to pay a total fine of ₹10,000 to the government, considering their voluntary guilty plea and lack of criminal intent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judge, Labour Court

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 23-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 148/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted two accused under the Equal Remuneration Act, 1976 and Gujarat Rules, 1976 (Rule 6) for violating equal pay provisions for employees of a private hospital. Each accused was sentenced to a fine of ₹5,000 with a one-month simple imprisonment in default, and directed to pay a total fine of ₹10,000 to the government, considering their voluntary guilty plea and lack of criminal intent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case