RAMCHANDRA OMKAR KOLI, vs MIHIR SILK MILLS, Advocate - C.T.DORIWALA — 546/2002
Case under Gujarat Industrial Relation Act, 1946 Section 106. Status: For Order. Next hearing: 20th April 2026.
TAPP-LC - APPLICATION FOR TERMINATION
CNR: GJSR140000692002
Next Hearing
20th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
546/2002
Filing Date
21-09-2002
Registration No
546/2002
Registration Date
21-09-2002
Court
LABOUR COURT, SURAT
Judge
1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAMCHANDRA OMKAR KOLI,
Adv. A.B.NAIK
Respondent(s)
MIHIR SILK MILLS, Advocate - C.T.DORIWALA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT
For Order
For Order
For Order
For Arguement of opponent
For Arguement of opponent
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 13-04-2026 | For Order | |
| 30-03-2026 | For Order | |
| 24-03-2026 | For Order | |
| 18-03-2026 | For Arguement of opponent | |
| 16-03-2026 | For Arguement of opponent |
Interim Orders
Summary The petition (Appeal No. 546/2002) filed by Ramchandra Omkar Choli against Mihir Silk Mills has been dismissed. The court found that the petitioner failed to substantiate his claims with proper evidence and that the respondent company (Mihir Silk Mills Pvt. Ltd.) did not exist as an entity in 2001, though Messrs Mihir Silk Mills Pvt. Ltd. was operational. The court determined the petition was not maintainable and rejected the relief sought. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The petition (Appeal No. 546/2002) filed by Ramchandra Omkar Choli against Mihir Silk Mills has been dismissed. The court found that the petitioner failed to substantiate his claims with proper evidence and that the respondent company (Mihir Silk Mills Pvt. Ltd.) did not exist as an entity in 2001, though Messrs Mihir Silk Mills Pvt. Ltd. was operational. The court determined the petition was not maintainable and rejected the relief sought. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts