DR. G. V. SAVANI, GOVERNMENT LABOUR OFFICER AND BONUS PAYMENT INSPECTOR, SURAT vs KIRTI HEALTHCARE PRIVATE LIMITED, (COMPANY) — 48/2026

Case under Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 Section 27(4). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJSR140000632026

Filing Number

48/2026

Filing Date

03-Jan-2026

Registration No

48/2026

Registration Date

03-Jan-2026

Court

LABOUR COURT, SURAT

Judge

2-Judge, Labour Court

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 12-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 Section 27(4)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DR. G. V. SAVANI, GOVERNMENT LABOUR OFFICER AND BONUS PAYMENT INSPECTOR, SURAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KIRTI HEALTHCARE PRIVATE LIMITED, (COMPANY)

  2. 2.JOY KIRTIKANT SHAH, (DIRECTORSHRI)

  3. 3.MEGHA JOY, (DIRECTORSHRI)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary The Gujarat High Court convicted the accused under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023 (Section 275) and the Bonus Recovery Act 1965 (Section 28), finding that the accused voluntarily and willingly confessed to the crime. The court sentenced each accused to a fine of Rs. 1,000 with 10 days simple imprisonment in default, and imposed a total fine of Rs. 3,000 on the accused, rejecting their plea for reformative over punitive sentencing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judge, Labour Court

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Judge, Labour Court

  5. 21-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 03-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 48/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Gujarat High Court convicted the accused under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023 (Section 275) and the Bonus Recovery Act 1965 (Section 28), finding that the accused voluntarily and willingly confessed to the crime. The court sentenced each accused to a fine of Rs. 1,000 with 10 days simple imprisonment in default, and imposed a total fine of Rs. 3,000 on the accused, rejecting their plea for reformative over punitive sentencing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case