DR. G. V. SAVANI, GOVERNMENT LABOUR OFFICER AND GRATUITY PAYMENT INSPECTOR, SURAT vs KIRTI HEALTHCARE PRIVATE LIMITED, (COMPANY) — 47/2026
Case under The Payment of Gratuity (gujarat) Rules, 1973 Section 6(7),6(2),. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJSR140000622026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
47/2026
Filing Date
03-01-2026
Registration No
47/2026
Registration Date
03-01-2026
Court
LABOUR COURT, SURAT
Judge
2-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
DR. G. V. SAVANI, GOVERNMENT LABOUR OFFICER AND GRATUITY PAYMENT INSPECTOR, SURAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
KIRTI HEALTHCARE PRIVATE LIMITED, (COMPANY)
JOY KIRTIKANT SHAH, (DIRECTORSHRI)
MEGHA JOY, (DIRECTORSHRI)
Hearing History
Judge: 2-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 07-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 21-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Gujarat High Court convicted the accused under IPC Section 275 and Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) 2023 Section 275, read with rules regarding Payment of Gratuity Act violation. The court imposed a fine of ₹10,000 per accused (with 10-day imprisonment as default), and ordered a total fine of ₹30,000, finding the accused guilty of voluntary confession and conclusive evidence of the offense despite educational sentencing being an alternative option. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Gujarat High Court convicted the accused under IPC Section 275 and Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) 2023 Section 275, read with rules regarding Payment of Gratuity Act violation. The court imposed a fine of ₹10,000 per accused (with 10-day imprisonment as default), and ordered a total fine of ₹30,000, finding the accused guilty of voluntary confession and conclusive evidence of the offense despite educational sentencing being an alternative option. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts