THE DIRECTOR SARADAR VALLABHBHAI NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGYSVNIT vs THE SECRETARY SURAT JILLA BHARATIYA MAZDOOR SANGH Advocate - M.I.SHAIKH — 10/2025

Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 11(1). Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

MISCAPP-ITC - MISC. APPLICATION (I.T.C.)

CNR: GJSR130001732025

Filing Number

10/2025

Filing Date

02-Nov-2020

Registration No

10/2025

Registration Date

02-Nov-2020

Court

INDUSTRIAL COURT, SURAT

Judge

1-Member, Industrial Court

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 31-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 11(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE DIRECTOR SARADAR VALLABHBHAI NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGYSVNIT

    Adv. A.P.SHAH

  2. 2.THE GENERAL SECRATARY GUJARAT AUDHYOGIK KAMADAR MAHAMANDAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE SECRETARY SURAT JILLA BHARATIYA MAZDOOR SANGH Advocate - M.I.SHAIKH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Judegement

    Case Summary: Misc.Appli.(I.T.C.) No.10 of 2025 Court Decision: The Industrial Tribunal dismissed the petitioner institution's plea for revision of an arbitral award. The tribunal found that the petitioner institution failed to provide adequate reasons for challenging the award within the statutory 30-day period and that subsequent applications for rectification lacked sufficient grounds. The court held that while fraud requires clear proof and cannot be assumed based on procedural delays alone, the petitioner's own negligence, lack of diligence, and administrative failures precluded relief. The award was upheld as valid, and no cost was imposed on either party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Disposed

    Member, Industrial Court

  4. 01-May-2026

    Judgement

    Member, Industrial Court

  5. 10-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    Member, Industrial Court

  6. 03-Apr-2026

    Final Arguments

    Member, Industrial Court

  7. 13-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Member, Industrial Court

  8. 27-Feb-2026

    Final Arguments

    Member, Industrial Court

  9. 16-Jan-2026

    Notice To Opponents

    Member, Industrial Court

  10. 11-Dec-2025

    Notice To Opponents

    Member, Industrial Court

  11. 20-Nov-2025

    Notice To Opponents

    Member, Industrial Court

  12. 16-Oct-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  13. 02-Nov-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. 10/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Misc.Appli.(I.T.C.) No.10 of 2025 Court Decision: The Industrial Tribunal dismissed the petitioner institution's plea for revision of an arbitral award. The tribunal found that the petitioner institution failed to provide adequate reasons for challenging the award within the statutory 30-day period and that subsequent applications for rectification lacked sufficient grounds. The court held that while fraud requires clear proof and cannot be assumed based on procedural delays alone, the petitioner's own negligence, lack of diligence, and administrative failures precluded relief. The award was upheld as valid, and no cost was imposed on either party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case