THE DIRECTOR SARADAR VALLABHBHAI NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGYSVNIT vs THE SECRETARY SURAT JILLA BHARATIYA MAZDOOR SANGH Advocate - M.I.SHAIKH — 9/2025
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 11(1). Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 08th May 2026.
MISCAPP-ITC - MISC. APPLICATION (I.T.C.)
CNR: GJSR130001722025
Filing Number
9/2025
Filing Date
02-11-2020
Registration No
9/2025
Registration Date
02-11-2020
Court
INDUSTRIAL COURT, SURAT
Judge
1-MEMBER, INDUSTRIAL COURT
Decision Date
08th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE DIRECTOR SARADAR VALLABHBHAI NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGYSVNIT
Adv. A.P.SHAH
Respondent(s)
THE SECRETARY SURAT JILLA BHARATIYA MAZDOOR SANGH Advocate - M.I.SHAIKH
Hearing History
Judge: 1-MEMBER, INDUSTRIAL COURT
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 01-05-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 10-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 03-04-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 13-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Misc.Appli.(I.T.C.) No.09 of 2025 Court Decision: The court ALLOWED the petitioner SVNIT's appeal for revision of an earlier award. The court found that the original award (issued on 11 April 2019) was flawed due to procedural defects, including the advocate's absence and lack of proper authorization. The court remanded the case back with directions to file a fresh application, permitting the petitioner adequate time and opportunity to properly present its case before the appropriate authorities. Key Reasoning: The court held that since sufficient reasons justifying the delay in filing the revised application were not adequately demonstrated, and considering COVID-19 pandemic impacts and administrative changes, the petitioner should be given a fair opportunity to file a properly constituted application with complete documentation and proper representation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Misc.Appli.(I.T.C.) No.09 of 2025 Court Decision: The court ALLOWED the petitioner SVNIT's appeal for revision of an earlier award. The court found that the original award (issued on 11 April 2019) was flawed due to procedural defects, including the advocate's absence and lack of proper authorization. The court remanded the case back with directions to file a fresh application, permitting the petitioner adequate time and opportunity to properly present its case before the appropriate authorities. Key Reasoning: The court held that since sufficient reasons justifying the delay in filing the revised application were not adequately demonstrated, and considering COVID-19 pandemic impacts and administrative changes, the petitioner should be given a fair opportunity to file a properly constituted application with complete documentation and proper representation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts