YASH ROAD LINES vs DEPUTY DIRECTOR,EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION Advocate - M C VAGHELA — 12/2024

Case under Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 Section 75. Status: For Evidence of Applicant. Next hearing: 14th July 2026.

For Evidence of Applicant Next hearing 14-Jul-2026 this date has passed

APPLN ESI - APPLICATION E.S.I.

CNR: GJSR130001552024

Filing Number

12/2024

Filing Date

06-Dec-2024

Registration No

12/2024

Registration Date

06-Dec-2024

Court

INDUSTRIAL COURT, SURAT

Judge

2-Member, Industrial Court

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 Section 75

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.YASH ROAD LINES

    Adv. Y.B.RATHOD

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DEPUTY DIRECTOR,EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION Advocate - M C VAGHELA

  2. 2.RECOVERY OFFICER, EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION

Case History

  1. 14-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 23-Jun-2026

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Member, Industrial Court

  3. 09-Jun-2026

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Member, Industrial Court

  4. 19-May-2026

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Member, Industrial Court

  5. 28-Apr-2026

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Member, Industrial Court

  6. 24-Mar-2026

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Member, Industrial Court

  7. 14-Mar-2026

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Member, Industrial Court

  8. 10-Mar-2026

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Member, Industrial Court

  9. 24-Feb-2026

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Member, Industrial Court

  10. 03-Feb-2026

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Member, Industrial Court

  11. 27-Jan-2026

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Member, Industrial Court

  12. 06-Jan-2026

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Member, Industrial Court

  13. 16-Dec-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Member, Industrial Court

  14. 09-Dec-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Member, Industrial Court

  15. 18-Nov-2025

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: YASH ROAD LINES v. DEPUTY DIRECTOR, ESIC (12/2024) The Industrial Court of Surat granted permission to Yash Road Lines to file a court case outside the new Amnesty Scheme-2025 under the Employees' State Insurance Act. The petitioner sought relief to pursue its case before the State Insurance Court, which was made conditional under the amnesty scheme. The court found the petitioner's request for permission to be proper, necessary, and justified, allowing the case to proceed with court sanction on November 18, 2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  16. 18-Nov-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Member, Industrial Court

  17. 28-Oct-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Member, Industrial Court

  18. 23-Sep-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Member, Industrial Court

  19. 26-Aug-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Member, Industrial Court

  20. 29-Jul-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Member, Industrial Court

  21. 01-Jul-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Member, Industrial Court

  22. 03-Jun-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Member, Industrial Court

  23. 20-May-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Member, Industrial Court

  24. 22-Apr-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Member, Industrial Court

  25. 18-Mar-2025

    Reply

    Member, Industrial Court

  26. 25-Feb-2025

    Reply

    Member, Industrial Court

  27. 04-Feb-2025

    Reply

    Member, Industrial Court

  28. 31-Dec-2024

    Reply

    Member, Industrial Court

  29. 17-Dec-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  30. 06-Dec-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 12/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: YASH ROAD LINES v. DEPUTY DIRECTOR, ESIC (12/2024) The Industrial Court of Surat granted permission to Yash Road Lines to file a court case outside the new Amnesty Scheme-2025 under the Employees' State Insurance Act. The petitioner sought relief to pursue its case before the State Insurance Court, which was made conditional under the amnesty scheme. The court found the petitioner's request for permission to be proper, necessary, and justified, allowing the case to proceed with court sanction on November 18, 2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case