STATE BANK OF SAURASHTRA MERGE OF STATE BANK INDIA vs MANISH NATAVARLAL BHATT Advocate - M.N.SHAH - R.A.VYAS — 45/2025
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10. Status: For Argument of Second party. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
REF-ITC - REFERENCE (I.T.C.)
CNR: GJSR130001462025
Filing Number
45/2025
Filing Date
20-Feb-2009
Registration No
45/2025
Registration Date
20-Feb-2009
Court
INDUSTRIAL COURT, SURAT
Judge
1-Member, Industrial Court
Last updated 31-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.STATE BANK OF SAURASHTRA MERGE OF STATE BANK INDIA
Adv. M V PATEL
Respondent(s)
-
1.MANISH NATAVARLAL BHATT Advocate - M.N.SHAH - R.A.VYAS
Case History
-
12-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
29-May-2026
For Argument of Second party
Member, Industrial Court
-
08-May-2026
For Argument of Second party
Member, Industrial Court
-
24-Apr-2026
For Argument of Second party
Member, Industrial Court
-
10-Apr-2026
OrderView PDF
The court granted a tentative case number to the petition filed by the respondent's counsel regarding a certificate under Order 20, Rule 1. The court ordered that the zero draft copy document be assigned a tentative number in the absence of any objection from the first petitioner's counsel regarding its admissibility. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Apr-2026
For Argument of Second party
Member, Industrial Court
-
13-Mar-2026
For Notice Serve to both partys
Member, Industrial Court
-
20-Feb-2026
For Notice Serve to both partys
Member, Industrial Court
-
16-Jan-2026
For Notice Serve to both partys
Member, Industrial Court
-
01-Jan-2026
For Notice Serve to both partys
Member, Industrial Court
-
04-Dec-2025
For Notice Serve to both partys
Member, Industrial Court
-
06-Nov-2025
For Notice Serve to both partys
Member, Industrial Court
-
16-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Feb-2009
Case filed
Registration No. 45/2025
The court granted a tentative case number to the petition filed by the respondent's counsel regarding a certificate under Order 20, Rule 1. The court ordered that the zero draft copy document be assigned a tentative number in the absence of any objection from the first petitioner's counsel regarding its admissibility. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts