MANTRI, GUJARAT RAJAY KAMDAR SENE, vs M/S SPECIALITY PAPERS LTD Advocate - J M PATEL — 50/2012
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 010. Status: For award. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.
REF IT - REFERENCE I.T.
CNR: GJSR130001222012
Next Hearing
23rd June 2026
Filing Number
50/2012
Filing Date
21-07-2012
Registration No
50/2012
Registration Date
21-07-2012
Court
INDUSTRIAL COURT, SURAT
Judge
2-MEMBER, INDUSTRIAL COURT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MANTRI, GUJARAT RAJAY KAMDAR SENE,
Adv. M.I.SHAIKH
Respondent(s)
M/S SPECIALITY PAPERS LTD Advocate - J M PATEL
Hearing History
Judge: 2-MEMBER, INDUSTRIAL COURT
For award
For Argument of Second party
For Argument of Second party
For Argument of Second party
For Evidence of first party
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-05-2026 | For award |
| 15-05-2026 | For Argument of Second party |
| 08-05-2026 | For Argument of Second party |
| 01-05-2026 | For Argument of Second party |
| 24-04-2026 | For Evidence of first party |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 50/2012 Outcome: The petition filed by MANTRI, GUJARAT RAJAY KAMDAR SENE against M/S SPECIALITY PAPERS LTD was dismissed. The court rejected the petitioner's request for documents from the company and ruled that a party cannot conduct "fishing or roving inquiries" to gather evidence for their case. The court held that the demanded documents were not relevant to the proceedings and that the petitioner had not demonstrated legitimate grounds for the disclosure request. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 50/2012 Outcome: The petition filed by MANTRI, GUJARAT RAJAY KAMDAR SENE against M/S SPECIALITY PAPERS LTD was dismissed. The court rejected the petitioner's request for documents from the company and ruled that a party cannot conduct "fishing or roving inquiries" to gather evidence for their case. The court held that the demanded documents were not relevant to the proceedings and that the petitioner had not demonstrated legitimate grounds for the disclosure request. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts