TORRENT POWER SURAT ELECTRICITY COMPANY EMPLOYEES UNION vs TORRENT POWER LTD. Advocate - U S TRIVEDI — 1/2023
Case under Gujarat Industrial Relation Act, 1946 Section 73-A. Status: For Production of Document. Next hearing: 24th April 2026.
REF IC - REFERENCE IC
CNR: GJSR130001152023
Next Hearing
24th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1/2023
Filing Date
22-05-2023
Registration No
1/2023
Registration Date
22-05-2023
Court
INDUSTRIAL COURT, SURAT
Judge
2-MEMBER, INDUSTRIAL COURT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
TORRENT POWER SURAT ELECTRICITY COMPANY EMPLOYEES UNION
Adv. R A VYAS
Respondent(s)
TORRENT POWER LTD. Advocate - U S TRIVEDI
Hearing History
Judge: 2-MEMBER, INDUSTRIAL COURT
For Production of Document
For Production of Document
For Production of Document
For Production of Document
For Production of Document
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 20-03-2026 | For Production of Document | |
| 09-03-2026 | For Production of Document | |
| 06-03-2026 | For Production of Document | |
| 20-02-2026 | For Production of Document | |
| 23-01-2026 | For Production of Document |
Interim Orders
Summary The petition filed by Surat Electricity Company Limited against Torrent Power seeking documents and inspection details is dismissed. The court held that the company failed to present clear, necessary documents and that the information sought was not properly substantiated or directly relevant to the case, rejecting the petition on procedural and substantive grounds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The petition filed by Surat Electricity Company Limited against Torrent Power seeking documents and inspection details is dismissed. The court held that the company failed to present clear, necessary documents and that the information sought was not properly substantiated or directly relevant to the case, rejecting the petition on procedural and substantive grounds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts