SMT. NIRMALABEN VALLABHBHAI SOLANKI vs FACTORY MANAGER, GARDEN SILK MILS LTD Advocate - U S TRIVEDI — 26/2024

Case under Gujarat Industrial Relation Act, 1946 Section 84. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 22nd May 2026.

MISCAPP-IC - MISC. APPLICATION (I.C.)

CNR: GJSR130000932024

Case disposed

Filing Number

26/2024

Filing Date

20-06-2024

Registration No

26/2024

Registration Date

20-06-2024

Court

INDUSTRIAL COURT, SURAT

Judge

2-MEMBER, INDUSTRIAL COURT

Decision Date

22nd May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGEMENT

Acts & Sections

Gujarat Industrial Relation Act, 1946 Section 84

Petitioner(s)

SMT. NIRMALABEN VALLABHBHAI SOLANKI

Adv. S.T.CHAUDHARI

Respondent(s)

FACTORY MANAGER, GARDEN SILK MILS LTD Advocate - U S TRIVEDI

Hearing History

Judge: 2-MEMBER, INDUSTRIAL COURT

22-05-2026

Disposed

08-05-2026

JUDGEMENT

07-05-2026

REPLY

01-05-2026

REPLY

10-04-2026

REPLY

Final Orders / Judgements

22-05-2026
JUDEGEMENT

CASE SUMMARY: 26/2024 The Industrial Court of Surat granted Smt. Nirmalaben Vallabhbhai Solanki's application for condonation of delay in filing an appeal under Section 84(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act. The petitioner had delayed filing her appeal by 17 days (or 77 days from the judgment date) against a March 4, 2024 labor court order in Original T-case 847/1993. The court found the delay was not willful or intentional—it arose because the petitioner's union's address appeared on the original application, so she did not receive the court's certified copy initially. Once she obtained it in April 2024, financial hardship and need for legal consultation caused further delay. The court applied equitable principles prioritizing substantive justice over technical grounds, holding that no bad faith delay occurred and condoning the delay to allow merit-based adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

CASE SUMMARY: 26/2024 The Industrial Court of Surat granted Smt. Nirmalaben Vallabhbhai Solanki's application for condonation of delay in filing an appeal under Section 84(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act. The petitioner had delayed filing her appeal by 17 days (or 77 days from the judgment date) against a March 4, 2024 labor court order in Original T-case 847/1993. The court found the delay was not willful or intentional—it arose because the petitioner's union's address appeared on the original application, so she did not receive the court's certified copy initially. Once she obtained it in April 2024, financial hardship and need for legal consultation caused further delay. The court applied equitable principles prioritizing substantive justice over technical grounds, holding that no bad faith delay occurred and condoning the delay to allow merit-based adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

INDUSTRIAL COURT, SURAT All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case