RAJENDRABHAI AVCHIT PATIL vs AGRAWAL TEXTILE PRINTING MILLS Advocate - M N shah G/437/2001 — 52/2023
Case under Gujarat Industrial Relation Act, 1946 Section 84. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 09th April 2026.
APPEAL IC - APPEAL I.C.
CNR: GJSR130000822023
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
52/2023
Filing Date
24-04-2023
Registration No
52/2023
Registration Date
24-04-2023
Court
INDUSTRIAL COURT, SURAT
Judge
1-MEMBER, INDUSTRIAL COURT
Decision Date
09th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAJENDRABHAI AVCHIT PATIL
Adv. DIPAK K.PIPRODIA
Respondent(s)
AGRAWAL TEXTILE PRINTING MILLS Advocate - M N shah G/437/2001
Hearing History
Judge: 1-MEMBER, INDUSTRIAL COURT
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 23-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 02-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 05-01-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court upheld the Labor Court's decision dismissing the employee's unfair dismissal claim. The court found that the respondent company was justified in terminating the appellant's 20-year employment without providing mandatory statutory documents (ID card, salary slip, discharge letter) because no employer-employee relationship was formally established—the employee was hired informally without proper documentation, and the company never recognized him as a regular employee, thus making the termination lawful and the appeal lacking merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court upheld the Labor Court's decision dismissing the employee's unfair dismissal claim. The court found that the respondent company was justified in terminating the appellant's 20-year employment without providing mandatory statutory documents (ID card, salary slip, discharge letter) because no employer-employee relationship was formally established—the employee was hired informally without proper documentation, and the company never recognized him as a regular employee, thus making the termination lawful and the appeal lacking merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts