GARDEN SILK MILLS PVT.LTD. ERSTWHILE GARDEN SILK MILLS LTD. vs DADA LALCHNDRA JADAV Advocate - S T CHAUDHARI — 21/2025

Case under Gujarat Industrial Relation Act, 1946 Section 84(2). Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 22nd May 2026.

Case disposed

MISCAPP-IC - MISC. APPLICATION (I.C.)

CNR: GJSR130000392025

Filing Number

21/2025

Filing Date

15-Mar-2025

Registration No

21/2025

Registration Date

15-Mar-2025

Court

INDUSTRIAL COURT, SURAT

Judge

2-Member, Industrial Court

Decision Date

22-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGEMENT

Last updated 31-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat Industrial Relation Act, 1946 Section 84(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GARDEN SILK MILLS PVT.LTD. ERSTWHILE GARDEN SILK MILLS LTD.

    Adv. M V PATEL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DADA LALCHNDRA JADAV Advocate - S T CHAUDHARI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 22-May-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: Misc. Appli. (I.C.) No. 21/2025 Court Decision: The Industrial Court of Surat granted Garden Silk Mills Pvt. Ltd.'s application to condone the delay of 1 year, 9 months, and 15 days in filing an appeal against a Labour Court order (T. Case No. 560/1993 dated 10/02/2023) under Section 84(2) of the Industrial Relations Code, on the condition that the company pay Rs. 5,001 to the worker as costs within 30 days. Key Reasoning: The court found the delay was caused by legitimate reasons beyond the company's control—internal reorganization, personal hardships of responsible personnel, incomplete legal documentation from previous counsel, and administrative difficulties—rather than willful misconduct or bad faith. Applying Supreme Court precedent emphasizing substantive justice over technical grounds, the court held that denying condonation would result in injustice and prevent merit-based adjudication of the appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 22-May-2026

    Disposed

    Member, Industrial Court

  4. 08-May-2026

    Judgement

    Member, Industrial Court

  5. 08-May-2026

    Judgement

    Member, Industrial Court

  6. 07-May-2026

    Final Arguments

    Member, Industrial Court

  7. 07-May-2026

    Final Arguments

    Member, Industrial Court

  8. 01-May-2026

    Final Arguments

    Member, Industrial Court

  9. 01-May-2026

    Final Arguments

    Member, Industrial Court

  10. 10-Apr-2026

    Final Arguments

    Member, Industrial Court

  11. 09-Apr-2026

    Final Arguments

    Member, Industrial Court

  12. 04-Apr-2026

    Reply

    Member, Industrial Court

  13. 04-Apr-2026

    Reply

    Member, Industrial Court

  14. 13-Mar-2026

    Reply

    Member, Industrial Court

  15. 13-Mar-2026

    Reply

    Member, Industrial Court

  16. 13-Feb-2026

    Reply

    Member, Industrial Court

  17. 13-Feb-2026

    Reply

    Member, Industrial Court

  18. 16-Jan-2026

    Reply

    Member, Industrial Court

  19. 16-Jan-2026

    Reply

    Member, Industrial Court

  20. 26-Dec-2025

    Reply

    Member, Industrial Court

  21. 26-Dec-2025

    Reply

    Member, Industrial Court

  22. 19-Dec-2025

    Reply

    Member, Industrial Court

  23. 19-Dec-2025

    Reply

    Member, Industrial Court

  24. 21-Nov-2025

    Notice To Opponents

    Member, Industrial Court

  25. 03-Oct-2025

    Notice To Opponents

    Member, Industrial Court

  26. 12-Sep-2025

    Notice To Opponents

    Member, Industrial Court

  27. 25-Jul-2025

    Notice To Opponents

    Member, Industrial Court

  28. 27-Jun-2025

    Notice To Opponents

    Member, Industrial Court

  29. 02-May-2025

    Notice To Opponents

    Member, Industrial Court

  30. 05-Apr-2025

    Notice To Opponents

    Member, Industrial Court

  31. 04-Apr-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  32. 15-Mar-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 21/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Misc. Appli. (I.C.) No. 21/2025 Court Decision: The Industrial Court of Surat granted Garden Silk Mills Pvt. Ltd.'s application to condone the delay of 1 year, 9 months, and 15 days in filing an appeal against a Labour Court order (T. Case No. 560/1993 dated 10/02/2023) under Section 84(2) of the Industrial Relations Code, on the condition that the company pay Rs. 5,001 to the worker as costs within 30 days. Key Reasoning: The court found the delay was caused by legitimate reasons beyond the company's control—internal reorganization, personal hardships of responsible personnel, incomplete legal documentation from previous counsel, and administrative difficulties—rather than willful misconduct or bad faith. Applying Supreme Court precedent emphasizing substantive justice over technical grounds, the court held that denying condonation would result in injustice and prevent merit-based adjudication of the appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case