DADA LALCHAND JADHAV vs FACTORY MANAGER, GARDEN SILK MILLS LTD. Advocate - UDAYAN TRIVRDI, U S TRIVEDI — 11/2024

Case under Gujarat Industrial Relation Act, 1946 Section 84(2). Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 22nd May 2026.

Case disposed

MISCAPP-IC - MISC. APPLICATION (I.C.)

CNR: GJSR130000212024

Filing Number

11/2024

Filing Date

15-Feb-2024

Registration No

11/2024

Registration Date

15-Feb-2024

Court

INDUSTRIAL COURT, SURAT

Judge

2-Member, Industrial Court

Decision Date

22-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGEMENT

Last updated 31-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat Industrial Relation Act, 1946 Section 84(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DADA LALCHAND JADHAV

    Adv. S.T.CHAUDHRY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.FACTORY MANAGER, GARDEN SILK MILLS LTD. Advocate - UDAYAN TRIVRDI, U S TRIVEDI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 22-May-2026

    Judegement

    Case Summary: Misc. Appli. (I.C.) No. 11/2024 Court Decision: The Second Industrial Court, Surat granted the petitioner Dada Lalchand Jadhav's application to condone a 138-day delay in filing an appeal against a Labour Court order dated February 10, 2023, under Section 84(2) of the Gujarat Industrial Relations Act. The court accepted the petitioner's reasons for delay, including displacement from his registered address, financial hardship, and physical illness, finding that substantive justice and the interests of fairness outweighed technical procedural delays. Key Reasoning: The court held that where actual justice and technical legal grounds conflict, substantive justice should prevail, particularly when delay was neither willful nor mala fide. The petitioner's appeal was directed to be registered for merit-based adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 22-May-2026

    Disposed

    Member, Industrial Court

  4. 08-May-2026

    Judgement

    Member, Industrial Court

  5. 08-May-2026

    Judgement

    Member, Industrial Court

  6. 07-May-2026

    Final Arguments

    Member, Industrial Court

  7. 07-May-2026

    Final Arguments

    Member, Industrial Court

  8. 01-May-2026

    Final Arguments

    Member, Industrial Court

  9. 01-May-2026

    Final Arguments

    Member, Industrial Court

  10. 10-Apr-2026

    Final Arguments

    Member, Industrial Court

  11. 09-Apr-2026

    Final Arguments

    Member, Industrial Court

  12. 04-Apr-2026

    Reply

    Member, Industrial Court

  13. 04-Apr-2026

    Reply

    Member, Industrial Court

  14. 13-Mar-2026

    Reply

    Member, Industrial Court

  15. 13-Mar-2026

    Reply

    Member, Industrial Court

  16. 13-Feb-2026

    Reply

    Member, Industrial Court

  17. 13-Feb-2026

    Reply

    Member, Industrial Court

  18. 16-Jan-2026

    Reply

    Member, Industrial Court

  19. 16-Jan-2026

    Reply

    Member, Industrial Court

  20. 26-Dec-2025

    Reply

    Member, Industrial Court

  21. 26-Dec-2025

    Reply

    Member, Industrial Court

  22. 19-Dec-2025

    Reply

    Member, Industrial Court

  23. 19-Dec-2025

    Reply

    Member, Industrial Court

  24. 21-Nov-2025

    Notice To Opponents

    Member, Industrial Court

  25. 03-Oct-2025

    Reply

    Member, Industrial Court

  26. 12-Sep-2025

    Reply

    Member, Industrial Court

  27. 25-Jul-2025

    Reply

    Member, Industrial Court

  28. 27-Jun-2025

    Reply

    Member, Industrial Court

  29. 02-May-2025

    Reply

    Member, Industrial Court

  30. 05-Apr-2025

    Reply

    Member, Industrial Court

  31. 04-Apr-2025

    Reply

    Member, Industrial Court

  32. 28-Feb-2025

    Reply

    Member, Industrial Court

  33. 24-Jan-2025

    Reply

    Member, Industrial Court

  34. 27-Dec-2024

    Reply

    Member, Industrial Court

  35. 29-Nov-2024

    Reply

    Member, Industrial Court

  36. 11-Oct-2024

    Reply

    Member, Industrial Court

  37. 23-Aug-2024

    Reply

    Member, Industrial Court

  38. 26-Jul-2024

    Reply

    Member, Industrial Court

  39. 21-Jun-2024

    Reply

    Member, Industrial Court

  40. 26-Apr-2024

    Reply

    Member, Industrial Court

  41. 14-Mar-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  42. 15-Feb-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 11/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Misc. Appli. (I.C.) No. 11/2024 Court Decision: The Second Industrial Court, Surat granted the petitioner Dada Lalchand Jadhav's application to condone a 138-day delay in filing an appeal against a Labour Court order dated February 10, 2023, under Section 84(2) of the Gujarat Industrial Relations Act. The court accepted the petitioner's reasons for delay, including displacement from his registered address, financial hardship, and physical illness, finding that substantive justice and the interests of fairness outweighed technical procedural delays. Key Reasoning: The court held that where actual justice and technical legal grounds conflict, substantive justice should prevail, particularly when delay was neither willful nor mala fide. The petitioner's appeal was directed to be registered for merit-based adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case