DADA LALCHAND JADHAV vs FACTORY MANAGER, GARDEN SILK MILLS LTD. Advocate - UDAYAN TRIVRDI, U S TRIVEDI — 11/2024

Case under Gujarat Industrial Relation Act, 1946 Section 84(2). Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 22nd May 2026.

MISCAPP-IC - MISC. APPLICATION (I.C.)

CNR: GJSR130000212024

Case disposed

Filing Number

11/2024

Filing Date

15-02-2024

Registration No

11/2024

Registration Date

15-02-2024

Court

INDUSTRIAL COURT, SURAT

Judge

2-MEMBER, INDUSTRIAL COURT

Decision Date

22nd May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGEMENT

Acts & Sections

Gujarat Industrial Relation Act, 1946 Section 84(2)

Petitioner(s)

DADA LALCHAND JADHAV

Adv. S.T.CHAUDHRY

Respondent(s)

FACTORY MANAGER, GARDEN SILK MILLS LTD. Advocate - UDAYAN TRIVRDI, U S TRIVEDI

Hearing History

Judge: 2-MEMBER, INDUSTRIAL COURT

22-05-2026

Disposed

08-05-2026

JUDGEMENT

08-05-2026

JUDGEMENT

07-05-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

07-05-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

Final Orders / Judgements

22-05-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary: Misc. Appli. (I.C.) No. 11/2024 Court Decision: The Second Industrial Court, Surat granted the petitioner Dada Lalchand Jadhav's application to condone a 138-day delay in filing an appeal against a Labour Court order dated February 10, 2023, under Section 84(2) of the Gujarat Industrial Relations Act. The court accepted the petitioner's reasons for delay, including displacement from his registered address, financial hardship, and physical illness, finding that substantive justice and the interests of fairness outweighed technical procedural delays. Key Reasoning: The court held that where actual justice and technical legal grounds conflict, substantive justice should prevail, particularly when delay was neither willful nor mala fide. The petitioner's appeal was directed to be registered for merit-based adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Misc. Appli. (I.C.) No. 11/2024 Court Decision: The Second Industrial Court, Surat granted the petitioner Dada Lalchand Jadhav's application to condone a 138-day delay in filing an appeal against a Labour Court order dated February 10, 2023, under Section 84(2) of the Gujarat Industrial Relations Act. The court accepted the petitioner's reasons for delay, including displacement from his registered address, financial hardship, and physical illness, finding that substantive justice and the interests of fairness outweighed technical procedural delays. Key Reasoning: The court held that where actual justice and technical legal grounds conflict, substantive justice should prevail, particularly when delay was neither willful nor mala fide. The petitioner's appeal was directed to be registered for merit-based adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

INDUSTRIAL COURT, SURAT All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case