DADA LALCHAND JADHAV vs FACTORY MANAGER, GARDEN SILK MILLS LTD. Advocate - UDAYAN TRIVRDI, U S TRIVEDI — 11/2024
Case under Gujarat Industrial Relation Act, 1946 Section 84(2). Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 22nd May 2026.
MISCAPP-IC - MISC. APPLICATION (I.C.)
CNR: GJSR130000212024
Filing Number
11/2024
Filing Date
15-02-2024
Registration No
11/2024
Registration Date
15-02-2024
Court
INDUSTRIAL COURT, SURAT
Judge
2-MEMBER, INDUSTRIAL COURT
Decision Date
22nd May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGEMENT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
DADA LALCHAND JADHAV
Adv. S.T.CHAUDHRY
Respondent(s)
FACTORY MANAGER, GARDEN SILK MILLS LTD. Advocate - UDAYAN TRIVRDI, U S TRIVEDI
Hearing History
Judge: 2-MEMBER, INDUSTRIAL COURT
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 08-05-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 08-05-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 07-05-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 07-05-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Misc. Appli. (I.C.) No. 11/2024 Court Decision: The Second Industrial Court, Surat granted the petitioner Dada Lalchand Jadhav's application to condone a 138-day delay in filing an appeal against a Labour Court order dated February 10, 2023, under Section 84(2) of the Gujarat Industrial Relations Act. The court accepted the petitioner's reasons for delay, including displacement from his registered address, financial hardship, and physical illness, finding that substantive justice and the interests of fairness outweighed technical procedural delays. Key Reasoning: The court held that where actual justice and technical legal grounds conflict, substantive justice should prevail, particularly when delay was neither willful nor mala fide. The petitioner's appeal was directed to be registered for merit-based adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Misc. Appli. (I.C.) No. 11/2024 Court Decision: The Second Industrial Court, Surat granted the petitioner Dada Lalchand Jadhav's application to condone a 138-day delay in filing an appeal against a Labour Court order dated February 10, 2023, under Section 84(2) of the Gujarat Industrial Relations Act. The court accepted the petitioner's reasons for delay, including displacement from his registered address, financial hardship, and physical illness, finding that substantive justice and the interests of fairness outweighed technical procedural delays. Key Reasoning: The court held that where actual justice and technical legal grounds conflict, substantive justice should prevail, particularly when delay was neither willful nor mala fide. The petitioner's appeal was directed to be registered for merit-based adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts