MANTRI GUJARAT SANYUKAT KAMDAR UNION vs MANAGER VALSAD NAGAR PALIKA Advocate - K.G.KAPTAN — 13/2008
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 010. Status: For Argument of first party. Next hearing: 05th June 2026.
REF IT - REFERENCE I.T.
CNR: GJSR130000152008
Next Hearing
05th June 2026
Filing Number
13/2008
Filing Date
23-07-2008
Registration No
13/2008
Registration Date
23-07-2008
Court
INDUSTRIAL COURT, SURAT
Judge
2-MEMBER, INDUSTRIAL COURT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MANTRI GUJARAT SANYUKAT KAMDAR UNION
Adv. A N PATEL
Respondent(s)
MANAGER VALSAD NAGAR PALIKA Advocate - K.G.KAPTAN
Hearing History
Judge: 2-MEMBER, INDUSTRIAL COURT
For Argument of first party
For Argument of first party
For Argument of first party
For Argument of first party
For Argument of first party
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-05-2026 | For Argument of first party |
| 22-05-2026 | For Argument of first party |
| 15-05-2026 | For Argument of first party |
| 08-05-2026 | For Argument of first party |
| 01-05-2026 | For Argument of first party |
Interim Orders
CASE SUMMARY: 13/2008 - MANTRI GUJARAT SANYUKAT KAMDAR UNION v. MANAGER VALSAD NAGAR PALIKA The petitioner's interim petition was granted. The court consolidated two related references (IT No. 71/10 and IT No. 13/08) involving similar claims regarding worker regularization and fringe benefits, and ordered both cases to be heard together. The court found no prejudice to either party by consolidating the proceedings given the identical nature of demands and issues in both references. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
CASE SUMMARY: 13/2008 - MANTRI GUJARAT SANYUKAT KAMDAR UNION v. MANAGER VALSAD NAGAR PALIKA The petitioner's interim petition was granted. The court consolidated two related references (IT No. 71/10 and IT No. 13/08) involving similar claims regarding worker regularization and fringe benefits, and ordered both cases to be heard together. The court found no prejudice to either party by consolidating the proceedings given the identical nature of demands and issues in both references. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts