HINDUJA HOUSING FINANCE LIMITED AUTHORIZED OFFICER NITIN SAMUDRE vs CHANDRAKANT MORE — 2457/2025
Case under Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 Section 14,. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 17th March 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC
CNR: GJSR120068142025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
2457/2025
Filing Date
05-12-2025
Registration No
2457/2025
Registration Date
05-12-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, KATHOR
Judge
3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
HINDUJA HOUSING FINANCE LIMITED AUTHORIZED OFFICER NITIN SAMUDRE
Adv. H D MORADIYA
Respondent(s)
CHANDRAKANT MORE
JIJABAI MORE
Hearing History
Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
FINAL HEARING
FINAL HEARING
FINAL HEARING
FINAL HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 11-03-2026 | FINAL HEARING | |
| 09-03-2026 | FINAL HEARING | |
| 31-01-2026 | FINAL HEARING | |
| 26-12-2025 | FINAL HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kathor, allowed Hinduja Housing Finance Limited's application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, to take possession of a mortgaged residential flat (Flat No. 304, Radhe Residency, Kadodara, Surat) from borrowers Chandarakant More and Jijabai More. The court found that the applicant satisfied all statutory requirements, issued a demand notice, and properly followed procedures, and appointed a court commissioner to execute possession within 90 days after the applicant deposits ₹15,000 for expenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kathor, allowed Hinduja Housing Finance Limited's application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, to take possession of a mortgaged residential flat (Flat No. 304, Radhe Residency, Kadodara, Surat) from borrowers Chandarakant More and Jijabai More. The court found that the applicant satisfied all statutory requirements, issued a demand notice, and properly followed procedures, and appointed a court commissioner to execute possession within 90 days after the applicant deposits ₹15,000 for expenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts