HINDUJA HOUSING FINANCE LIMITED AUTHORIZED OFFICER NITIN SAMUDRE vs PRINJAY CHODVADIYA — 2453/2025
Case under Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 Section 14,. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 17th March 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC
CNR: GJSR120068102025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
2453/2025
Filing Date
05-12-2025
Registration No
2453/2025
Registration Date
05-12-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, KATHOR
Judge
3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
HINDUJA HOUSING FINANCE LIMITED AUTHORIZED OFFICER NITIN SAMUDRE
Adv. H D MORADIYA
Respondent(s)
PRINJAY CHODVADIYA
REKHABEN CHODVAIYA
Hearing History
Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
FINAL HEARING
FINAL HEARING
FINAL HEARING
FINAL HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 11-03-2026 | FINAL HEARING | |
| 09-03-2026 | FINAL HEARING | |
| 31-01-2026 | FINAL HEARING | |
| 26-12-2025 | FINAL HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Surat, allowed Hinduja Housing Finance Limited's application to take possession of a residential flat mortgaged by borrowers Prinjay and Rekhaben Chodvadiya under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002. The court found that the finance company satisfied all statutory requirements, including issuing a 60-day demand notice and complying with procedural formalities, and appointed a court commissioner to execute the possession order with police assistance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Surat, allowed Hinduja Housing Finance Limited's application to take possession of a residential flat mortgaged by borrowers Prinjay and Rekhaben Chodvadiya under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002. The court found that the finance company satisfied all statutory requirements, including issuing a 60-day demand notice and complying with procedural formalities, and appointed a court commissioner to execute the possession order with police assistance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts