HINDUJA HOUSING FINANCE LIMITED AUTHORIZED OFFICER NITIN SAMUDRE vs PRINJAY CHODVADIYA — 2453/2025
Case under Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 Section 14. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 17th March 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC
CNR: GJSR120068102025
Filing Number
2453/2025
Filing Date
05-Dec-2025
Registration No
2453/2025
Registration Date
05-Dec-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, KATHOR
Judge
3-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
Decision Date
17-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Last updated 16-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.HINDUJA HOUSING FINANCE LIMITED AUTHORIZED OFFICER NITIN SAMUDRE
Adv. H D MORADIYA
Respondent(s)
-
1.PRINJAY CHODVADIYA
-
2.REKHABEN CHODVAIYA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Court Decision Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Surat, allowed Hinduja Housing Finance Limited's application to take possession of a residential flat mortgaged by borrowers Prinjay and Rekhaben Chodvadiya under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002. The court found that the finance company satisfied all statutory requirements, including issuing a 60-day demand notice and complying with procedural formalities, and appointed a court commissioner to execute the possession order with police assistance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
11-Mar-2026
Final Hearing
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
09-Mar-2026
Final Hearing
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
31-Jan-2026
Final Hearing
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
26-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 2453/2025
Court Decision Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Surat, allowed Hinduja Housing Finance Limited's application to take possession of a residential flat mortgaged by borrowers Prinjay and Rekhaben Chodvadiya under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002. The court found that the finance company satisfied all statutory requirements, including issuing a 60-day demand notice and complying with procedural formalities, and appointed a court commissioner to execute the possession order with police assistance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts