Government of Gujarat vs HITESHBHAI VALLBHBHAI SOLANKI Advocate - R D SONKAR — 2596/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 118(1),118(2),351(3). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 20th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJSR120048042025
Filing Number
2596/2025
Filing Date
22-Aug-2025
Registration No
2596/2025
Registration Date
22-Aug-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, KATHOR
Judge
1-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
20-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 05-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11214020251077
Police Station
KAMREJ POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.HITESHBHAI VALLBHBHAI SOLANKI Advocate - R D SONKAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
20-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary of Case 2596/2025 The court acquitted the accused, Hiteshbhai Vallbhbhai Solanki, of charges under IPC Sections 118(1), 118(2), and 351(3), finding that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that while witnesses testified about a ball-play incident on April 6, 2025, the evidence did not sufficiently establish that the accused made threatening statements or caused serious alarm to the complainant as required under criminal intimidation provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Apr-2026
Disposed
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Apr-2026
Judgement
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Mar-2026
Judgement
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 2596/2025
Summary of Case 2596/2025 The court acquitted the accused, Hiteshbhai Vallbhbhai Solanki, of charges under IPC Sections 118(1), 118(2), and 351(3), finding that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that while witnesses testified about a ball-play incident on April 6, 2025, the evidence did not sufficiently establish that the accused made threatening statements or caused serious alarm to the complainant as required under criminal intimidation provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts