Government of Gujarat vs PRAGNESH RAJUBHAI VASAVA Advocate - V C BODANA — 2218/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 143,326,337,323,504,506(2),114. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJSR120042972024

Filing Number

2218/2024

Filing Date

30-Aug-2024

Registration No

2218/2024

Registration Date

30-Aug-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, KATHOR

Judge

1-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11214020230086

Police Station

KAMREJ POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 143,326,337,323,504,506(2),114

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PRAGNESH RAJUBHAI VASAVA Advocate - V C BODANA

  2. 2.RUTVIK BIPUNBHAI VASAVA

  3. 3.DHIRAJ RAMESHBHAI VASAVA

  4. 4.NIKHIL VINUBHAI VASAVA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Judegement

    Summary: The court acquitted all four accused persons of charges under IPC sections 143, 326, 337, 323, 504, 506(2), and 114, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. The court held that while a confrontation occurred on 13 January 2023 near Rangli Chowkdi involving an altercation between the accused and the complainants, the evidence on record did not sufficiently establish that the accused deliberately caused grievous injuries or made criminal threats with the requisite intent. The court applied established legal principles regarding criminal intimidation and insult, noting that specific words or threats must be clearly proven to constitute violations of sections 504 and 506(2) IPC, which were lacking in the prosecution's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 27-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 10-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 04-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 22-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 20-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 16-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 28-May-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 24-Mar-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 10-Feb-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 17-Dec-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 24-Oct-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  16. 30-Aug-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2218/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court acquitted all four accused persons of charges under IPC sections 143, 326, 337, 323, 504, 506(2), and 114, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. The court held that while a confrontation occurred on 13 January 2023 near Rangli Chowkdi involving an altercation between the accused and the complainants, the evidence on record did not sufficiently establish that the accused deliberately caused grievous injuries or made criminal threats with the requisite intent. The court applied established legal principles regarding criminal intimidation and insult, noting that specific words or threats must be clearly proven to constitute violations of sections 504 and 506(2) IPC, which were lacking in the prosecution's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case