Government of Gujarat vs BIPINBHAI VICKY CHHOTELAL DAHAYAK Advocate - V C BODANA — 2395/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281,106(1). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 25th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJSR120042532025
Filing Number
2395/2025
Filing Date
16-Jul-2025
Registration No
2395/2025
Registration Date
16-Jul-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, KATHOR
Judge
1-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
25-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 16-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11214020251532
Police Station
KAMREJ POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.BIPINBHAI VICKY CHHOTELAL DAHAYAK Advocate - V C BODANA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Mar-2026
Judegement
Summary The court acquitted the accused, Bipinbhai alias Vicky Chhotelal Dahayak, of charges under IPC Sections 281, 106(1), and Motor Vehicles Act Sections 177 and 184, finding that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accident was caused by the accused's rash or negligent driving. The court noted that witnesses could not provide specific details about the vehicle's speed, and evidence suggested the rickshaw's tire burst due to road conditions, which amounted to an accident rather than criminal negligence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Mar-2026
Judgement
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
21-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Jul-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 2395/2025
Summary The court acquitted the accused, Bipinbhai alias Vicky Chhotelal Dahayak, of charges under IPC Sections 281, 106(1), and Motor Vehicles Act Sections 177 and 184, finding that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accident was caused by the accused's rash or negligent driving. The court noted that witnesses could not provide specific details about the vehicle's speed, and evidence suggested the rickshaw's tire burst due to road conditions, which amounted to an accident rather than criminal negligence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts