SHARDABEN D/O SUMANBHAI THAKORBHAI vs PRAMODBHAI ISHWARBHAI GAJJAR Advocate - V B KANSADWALA, N.M.SHAH — 176/2017
Case under Special Economic Zones Act, 2005 Section 034,037,038,022,031. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 13th March 2026.
SPCS - SPECIAL CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJSR120039832017
Filing Number
176/2017
Filing Date
22-01-2015
Registration No
176/2017
Registration Date
22-11-2017
Court
TALUKA COURT, KATHOR
Judge
2-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHARDABEN D/O SUMANBHAI THAKORBHAI
Adv. V B KANSADWALA
Respondent(s)
PRAMODBHAI ISHWARBHAI GAJJAR Advocate - V B KANSADWALA, N.M.SHAH
Hearing History
Judge: 2-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 26-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 30-01-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 21-01-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Shardaben v. Pramodbhai Ishwarbhai Gajjar (176/2017) The court rejected the plaintiff's suit seeking partition, declaration of ancestral property rights, and cancellation of sale deeds. The plaintiff claimed agricultural land in Choryasi and Kathor villages was Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) property, but the court found that Ishwarbhai held absolute individual ownership under the Ganotia Dhara Act after obtaining a Section 32(m) purchase certificate in 1991, making his 2004 sale to defendants valid and the plaintiff's claim barred by limitation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Shardaben v. Pramodbhai Ishwarbhai Gajjar (176/2017) The court rejected the plaintiff's suit seeking partition, declaration of ancestral property rights, and cancellation of sale deeds. The plaintiff claimed agricultural land in Choryasi and Kathor villages was Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) property, but the court found that Ishwarbhai held absolute individual ownership under the Ganotia Dhara Act after obtaining a Section 32(m) purchase certificate in 1991, making his 2004 sale to defendants valid and the plaintiff's claim barred by limitation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts