Government of Gujarat vs Chetanbhai Vallabhbhai Rathod — 1068/2023
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887 Section 4,5. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJSR120011812023
Filing Number
1068/2023
Filing Date
29-Jan-2023
Registration No
1068/2023
Registration Date
29-Jan-2023
Court
TALUKA COURT, KATHOR
Judge
2-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 03-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11214020201713
Police Station
KAMREJ POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Chetanbhai Vallabhbhai Rathod
-
2.HITESHBHAI MANSUKHBHAI PADAMANI
-
3.PARTHBHAI PRAVINBHAI RUPAPARA
-
4.ANILBHAI VALLABHBHAI RAMAI
-
5.JIGNESHBHAI ARAJANBHAI BHUVA
-
6.RAJANIBHAI DINESHBHAI GOYANI
-
7.BHAVINBHAI KALYANBHAI NAKRANI
-
8.HASMUKHBHAI BHANABHAI MOLIYA
-
9.ANKUSHBHAI ASHWINBHAI LUNAGARIYA
-
10.VIPULBHAI PARSOTTAMBHAI DUDHAT
-
11.BHAVESHBHAI BHIKHBHAI SAVANI
-
12.JAYESHBHAI MANJIBHAI NAKRANI
-
13.SHAILESHBHAI MATHIRBHAI KATHAROTIYA
-
14.JIGNESHBHAI MATHURBHAI JIYANI
-
15.MILANBHAI MANSUKHBHAI BHUVA
-
16.KAMLESHBHAI MAGANBHAI PADAMANI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The court closed Criminal Case No. 1068/2023 under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code, as six accused persons could not be apprehended despite repeated summons and warrants issued. The court found that the police failed to produce the accused despite adequate opportunities, defendants had no fixed addresses or property on record, and the case was in a deadlocked state with no reasonable prospect of future progress. However, the complainant can reopen the case if these accused are later apprehended. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
07-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
28-Jan-2026
Process To Accused
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
04-Dec-2025
Process To Accused
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
18-Oct-2025
Process To Accused
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
18-Aug-2025
Process To Accused
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
27-Jun-2025
Process To Accused
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
25-Apr-2025
Process To Accused
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
05-Mar-2025
Process To Accused
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
07-Feb-2025
Process To Accused
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
11-Dec-2024
Process To Accused
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
02-Dec-2024
Process To Accused
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
07-Nov-2024
Process To Accused
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
12-Sep-2024
Process To Accused
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
05-Sep-2024
Process To Accused
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
22-Jul-2024
Process To Accused
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
20-Jun-2024
Process To Accused
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
17-May-2024
Process To Accused
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
15-Apr-2024
Process To Accused
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
09-Mar-2024
Process To Accused
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
26-Feb-2024
Process To Accused
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
25-Jan-2024
Process To Accused
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
29-Dec-2023
Process To Accused
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
09-Dec-2023
Process To Accused
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
01-Dec-2023
Process To Accused
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
03-Nov-2023
Process To Accused
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
11-Oct-2023
Process To Accused
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
18-Sep-2023
Process To Accused
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
17-Aug-2023
Process To Accused
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
18-Jul-2023
Process To Accused
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
19-Jun-2023
Process To Accused
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
25-Apr-2023
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
14-Mar-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
29-Jan-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 1068/2023
The court closed Criminal Case No. 1068/2023 under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code, as six accused persons could not be apprehended despite repeated summons and warrants issued. The court found that the police failed to produce the accused despite adequate opportunities, defendants had no fixed addresses or property on record, and the case was in a deadlocked state with no reasonable prospect of future progress. However, the complainant can reopen the case if these accused are later apprehended. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts