Government of Gujarat vs IKBAL BAUDIN SAMA — 926/2023
Case under Public Gambling Act, 1867 [Section 1 18] Section 4,5. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJSR120010242023
Filing Number
911/2023
Filing Date
29-Jan-2023
Registration No
926/2023
Registration Date
29-Jan-2023
Court
TALUKA COURT, KATHOR
Judge
2-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 03-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11214020212327
Police Station
KAMREJ POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.IKBAL BAUDIN SAMA
-
2.SABBIR DAUDBHAI SIDAT
-
3.BASHIRSHA USHMANSHA FAKIR
-
4.NITESHBHAI MATHURBHAI KATARA
-
5.ARIF ALLAUDDIN ZAKHARA
-
6.RAHIM ABDUL SHAIKH
-
7.RAJUBHAI GURAJIBHAI CHARPOTA
-
8.RAHIMSHA AMINASHA FAKIR
-
9.HANIF KASIM SHAIKH
-
10.IMTIYAZ HANIF SHAIKH
-
11.KALPESHBHAI DHIRUBHAI MISTRI
-
12.MAHEBUB ABDUL SUMARA
-
13.DHANRAJ DIPAKBHAI VANSFODIYA
-
14.BILAL YUSUF AKUJI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The court closed Criminal Case No. 926/2023 under CrPC Section 258 against four accused persons (Aarif Allaudin Zakhra, Rajubhai Gurjibhai Charpota, Hanif Kasim Shaikh, and Mahebub Abdulbhai Sumra) who could not be apprehended despite repeated summons and warrants. The court found that keeping the case pending served no purpose as there was no reasonable prospect of effective proceedings, and the accused had no fixed address or property on record. The court also noted police failure in producing the accused despite adequate opportunities, making further detention of the case meaningless and unjust. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
07-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
28-Jan-2026
Process To Accused
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
10-Dec-2025
Process To Accused
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
29-Nov-2025
Process To Accused
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
25-Sep-2025
Process To Accused
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
18-Aug-2025
Process To Accused
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
27-Jun-2025
Process To Accused
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
25-Apr-2025
Process To Accused
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
05-Mar-2025
Process To Accused
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
07-Feb-2025
Process To Accused
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
11-Dec-2024
Process To Accused
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
23-Oct-2024
Process To Accused
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
11-Sep-2024
Process To Accused
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
30-Jul-2024
Process To Accused
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
02-May-2024
Process To Accused
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
06-Apr-2024
Process To Accused
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
02-Mar-2024
Process To Accused
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
12-Feb-2024
Process To Accused
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
30-Dec-2023
Process To Accused
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
09-Dec-2023
Process To Accused
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
05-Dec-2023
Process To Accused
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
21-Oct-2023
Process To Accused
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
26-Sep-2023
Process To Accused
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
09-Sep-2023
Process To Accused
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
29-Aug-2023
Process To Accused
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
05-Aug-2023
Process To Accused
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
12-Jul-2023
Process To Accused
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
12-Jun-2023
Process To Accused
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
02-May-2023
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Mar-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
29-Jan-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 926/2023
The court closed Criminal Case No. 926/2023 under CrPC Section 258 against four accused persons (Aarif Allaudin Zakhra, Rajubhai Gurjibhai Charpota, Hanif Kasim Shaikh, and Mahebub Abdulbhai Sumra) who could not be apprehended despite repeated summons and warrants. The court found that keeping the case pending served no purpose as there was no reasonable prospect of effective proceedings, and the accused had no fixed address or property on record. The court also noted police failure in producing the accused despite adequate opportunities, making further detention of the case meaningless and unjust. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts