Government of Gujarat vs SATTATREY PANDIT THAKARE — 806/2023
Case under Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 Section 11DEHA,. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJSR120009162023
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
803/2023
Filing Date
29-01-2023
Registration No
806/2023
Registration Date
29-01-2023
Court
TALUKA COURT, KATHOR
Judge
2-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OF
FIR Details
FIR Number
11214020201922
Police Station
KAMREJ POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
SATTATREY PANDIT THAKARE
RAHUL CHUNILAL THAKARE
KAILASH SUBHASH CHAUHAN
BALABHAU DASHRATH CHAUHAN
BALU UDHDHAV RAYAMALI
MAHENDRA UDHHDVRAV CHAUHAN
SANJAY FAKIRA CHAUHAN
Hearing History
Judge: 2-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 07-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 22-01-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 20-11-2025 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 11-09-2025 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court dismissed Criminal Case No. 806/2023 under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code against seven accused persons, finding that despite repeated summons and warrants, the accused remained absent and could not be produced before the court. The court determined the case had become deadwood with no reasonable prospect of effective proceedings, and keeping it pending would serve no justice. The court preserved the complainant's right to revive the case upon the accused's arrest in the future. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court dismissed Criminal Case No. 806/2023 under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code against seven accused persons, finding that despite repeated summons and warrants, the accused remained absent and could not be produced before the court. The court determined the case had become deadwood with no reasonable prospect of effective proceedings, and keeping it pending would serve no justice. The court preserved the complainant's right to revive the case upon the accused's arrest in the future. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts