LALIT DHIRAJBHAI MARU vs Government of Gujarat — 365/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 480. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC

CNR: GJSR120008902026

Filing Number

365/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

365/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KATHOR

Judge

1-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11214020260695

Police Station

KAMREJ POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 480

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 115(2),117(2),351(3),324(4)

Petitioner(s)

1.LALIT DHIRAJBHAI MARU

Adv. M B CHAUHAN

Respondent(s)

1.Government of Gujarat

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
09-Mar-2026

OrderView PDF

The court rejected the bail application of accused Lalit Dhirajbhai Maru. The accused was charged under BNS sections 115(2), 117(2), 351(3), 324(3), 54, and GP Act-135 for allegedly assaulting the complainant and witnesses with wooden sticks and making death threats. The court held that releasing the accused on bail at this stage would have a negative impact on society and fail to deter such crimes, noting the serious nature of the offense and its public commission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
09-Mar-2026

Disposed

Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
05-Mar-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
05-Mar-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 365/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected the bail application of accused Lalit Dhirajbhai Maru. The accused was charged under BNS sections 115(2), 117(2), 351(3), 324(3), 54, and GP Act-135 for allegedly assaulting the complainant and witnesses with wooden sticks and making death threats. The court held that releasing the accused on bail at this stage would have a negative impact on society and fail to deter such crimes, noting the serious nature of the offense and its public commission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.